Wanene ya haifar da rufin asirin ka'idar leak na asalin Covid? Da yawa daga cikinmu mun zaci hakan Anthony Fauci, sannan ya zama Darakta na Cibiyar Kula da Allergy da Cututtuka ta Amurka (NIAID). Duk da haka, sabuwar saki imel da kuma saƙonni nuna cewa da farko Fauci ya buɗe don bincikar yuwuwar leb ɗin da kyau. Biyo bayan ficewar sa na wayar tarho a ranar 1 ga Fabrairu 2020 tare da manyan masana kimiyyar dabbobi Kristian Andersen, Eddie Holmes da sauransu, Fauci ya rubuta wa wasu jami'an gwamnati da yawa don sanar da su cewa Jeremy Farrar, Daraktan Wellcome Trust, da Francis Collins, Daraktan Cibiyoyin Lafiya na Kasa, an ba su alhakin tuntuɓar WHO don kafa wani bincike na ƙasa da ƙasa game da sakamakon cutar. "Inda wannan jagora ya rage a gani," ya rubuta.
Fauci ya bayyana cewa wasu daga cikin masana kimiyyar da ke kiran sun yi la'akari da asalin dakin gwaje-gwaje ko mai yiwuwa, suna yin hakan "mafi karfi" bayan kiran, yayin da biyu kawai suka ce sun yi imanin za a iya kawar da irin wannan yanayin (waɗannan su ne Ron Fouchier da Christian Drosten). Don haka Fauci ya gabatar da batun ga abokan aikin gwamnati a matsayin hujjar kimiyya da ba a warware ba, tare da yawancin masana kimiyyar da ke son asalin lab. Babban aikin da ya gabatar shi ne shirya wata kungiya a karkashin hukumar ta WHO domin duba ta ba tare da nuna son kai ba.
Washegari, Collins ya rubuta wa Farrar don tabbatar da cewa yana bin wannan tare da Shugaban WHO Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Collins ya gaya wa Farrar cewa "yana zuwa kan ra'ayin cewa asalin halitta ya fi dacewa" amma ya ce yana bukatar WHO ta duba shi - ko da yake ya kara da cewa "yana da ra'ayin ku" cewa wannan babban abu ne don zama "shirin karfafa gwiwa" don kawar da "muryoyin makirci" wanda in ba haka ba zai iya yin "babban illa ga kimiyya da jituwa ta duniya." Wannan yana ba da shawarar tsarin siyasa na rashin tsaka-tsaki da ake bi, fiye da imel ɗin Fauci na ranar da ta gabata, ajanda da alama Farrar ne ke jagorantar shi.
Abin da ya faru na gaba yana da mahimmanci. Binciken rashin son kai da Fauci ya bayar bai taba faruwa ba. Abin da ya faru a maimakon haka shi ne cewa a ranar 3 ga Fabrairu - kwana biyu bayan taron wayar da kan Fauci - an sake gudanar da wani taron wayar tarho, wanda Cibiyar Kimiyya ta Kasa, Injiniya da Magunguna (NAS) ta shirya. Wannan ya kasance a matsayin martani ga buƙatun gwamnatin Amurka don shawarar kimiyya game da asalin cutar. An gayyaci Fauci don ba da "hangen nesa daga NIH/NIAID" gabanin tattaunawa ta bude baki. Fitowar da aka gabatar kafin taron ya bayyana ya kasance "dangane da kimiyya" rubutun yanar gizo, ba kamar abin da Andersen da sauransu ke aiki ba.
Duk da haka, washegari saƙon imel ya fito daga Andrew Pope, wani jami'in NAS, yana mai cewa "tsare-tsare sun canza" kuma a maimakon 'dangane da ilimin kimiyya' yanar gizo a yanzu akwai wata sanarwa da shugabannin manyan makarantun kasa guda uku suka sanya wa hannu kuma aka aika zuwa ga Gwamnati. Ya bayyana cewa wannan canjin shine abin da aka amince da shi a taron tarho, kodayake hakan bai fito fili ba kamar yadda imel ɗin bai fayyace ko su wanene “mu” waɗanda yanzu suke tunanin ainihin shirin bai dace ba. Abin da ya sa ya yiwu an amince da shi a taron tarho shi ne cewa imel ɗin ba ya tsammanin kowa zai yi watsi da canjin kuma yana ɗauka cewa duk suna cikin jirgin tare da sabon tsari.
Kamar yadda ake iya gani a ƙasa, sanarwar daga NAS (a cikin nau'i na wasiƙa) ta yi iƙirarin tuntuɓar ƙwararrun masana kimiyya masu dacewa (wannan mai yiwuwa shi ne abin da taron wayar tarho ke yi) kuma rahotanni daga gare su sun amince da cewa bayanan da aka samu sun dace da juyin halitta na halitta "kuma babu "babu shaida" an kirkiro kwayar cutar. Wannan ba taƙaitaccen bayani ba ne na tattaunawar da masana kimiyya suka yi a zahiri a lokacin, ba shakka. Maimakon haka, yana wakiltar ƙoƙarin siyasa don rufe ka'idar asalin lab - farkon irin wannan ƙoƙarin, a gaskiya.
Kristian Andersen ya shiga cikin taron wayar tarho na Fauci na 1 ga Fabrairu da kuma NAS teleconference na 3 ga Fabrairu, kuma abin sha'awa shine gudummawar da ya bayar bayan na karshen shine ya tura sanarwar ta yi karfi kan ƙin yarda da ra'ayin cewa an kirkiri kwayar cutar, yana mai cewa "bayanan sun nuna a ƙarshe" ba haka ba. Wannan duk da kasancewarsa a key murya kafin da kuma bayan wannan suna jayayya cewa asalin lab ba za a iya kawar da shi ba.
Andersen da alama ya ɗauki wani hali daban bayan makonni biyu, lokacin Nature sun ƙi da sigar farko na takarda 'Proximal Origin' saboda ɗaya daga cikin masu bitar (wanda ba a taɓa gane shi a fili ba) ya ce ba karfi sosai akan korar asalin lab. Andersen ya mayar da martani (a ranar 20 ga Fabrairu) tare da tsayayyen tsaro na rashin yin watsi da yiwuwar, yana mai cewa shaidar ba ta ba da izinin yanke shi ba kuma "dole ne a dauki shi a matsayin ka'idar kimiyya mai mahimmanci." Da alama wannan shi ne masanin kimiyyar da ke kira ga NAS da ta ci gaba da korar asalin lab. Mafi mahimmancin bayani shine Andersen yana yin banbance-banbance tsakanin ƙwayoyin cuta da aka ƙera da ƙwayar cuta wacce ta samo asali a cikin dakin gwaje-gwaje daga jerin abubuwan ta hanyar al'adar tantanin halitta. Wannan bambance-bambance ne da za a rasa akan yawancin mutane, duk da haka, kuma haƙiƙa wasu masana kimiyya a cikin tattaunawar imel da kansu sun ce bambancin bai inganta ba a cikin wannan mahallin. Hujjojin Andersen da ke yanke hukuncin aikin injiniya su ma ba sauti.
An gyara takardar 'Proximal Origin' don ƙin yarda da asalin lab da ƙarfi kafin a karɓa don bugawa a ciki. Yanayin Magunguna. Andersen ya shaidawa kwamitin da ke yaki da cutar a majalisar cewa ya sauya ra’ayinsa kan yiwuwar samun asalin dakin gwaje-gwaje tsakanin kin amincewa da mikawa, wanda dole ne ya faru tsakanin 20 ga Fabrairu zuwa 27 ga Fabrairu. Duk da haka, a matsayin tawagar a Jama'a sun nuna, a bayyane yake cewa Andersen har yanzu yana tunanin asalin lab (ciki har da injiniya) yana da kyau bayan wannan kwanan wata. A ranar 16 ga Afrilu ya rubuta wa abokan aikin sa: "Har yanzu ban gamsu da cewa babu wata al'ada da ta shiga ba. Har ila yau, ba za mu iya kawar da aikin injiniya ba (don bincike na asali)." Ya bayyana daga sakonnin Andersen Wannan matsin lamba na kin amincewa da asalin lab ya fito ne daga 'mafi girma' kuma ko dai yana nuna ƙin yarda da ka'idar ko kuma ya yi magana da kansa a cikin ta na ɗan lokaci.
To wanene ya shirya danne ka'idar asalin lab? Za mu iya gani a karon farko lokacin da aka fara rufewa daidai. Ya fara da taron wayar tarho na NAS a ranar 3 ga Fabrairu kuma ba, kamar yadda mutane da yawa suka ɗauka a baya, tare da taron wayar tarho na Fauci a ranar 1 ga Fabrairu. Wannan a bayyane yake saboda yayin da Fauci ya fito daga taron wayarsa yana ba da shawarar yin bincike na nuna son kai "ba tare da yanke hukunci ba" don ganin "inda hakan ke kaiwa," sakamakon tarho na NAS wani shiri ne na musamman na korar asalin lab da kuma da'awar yarjejeniya ta wucin gadi.
Wanene ya yanke wannan shawarar? Da alama wani abu ne da aka amince da shi a taron wayar tarho na NAS. Amma wa ya tura ta wannan hanyar, kuma me ya sa masana kimiyya kamar Andersen suka amince da shi duk da cewa ba su yarda da shi ba? Tabbas, Andersen da Co har yanzu suna ƙoƙarin shigar da ka'idar lab Nature a ranar 20 ga Fabrairu, kawai watsi da shi saboda wani maƙiyi mai bita ya dage da yiwuwar cire shi. Don haka duk da Andersen, Holmes, da sauransu a wasu lokuta a cikin sakonnin su na sirri cewa suna da sha'awar kokarin karyata ra'ayin lab, ba kamar su ne masu tayar da hankali ba.
Yana yiwuwa Fauci ba zato ba tsammani ya canza tunaninsa cikin dare, amma kuma da alama ba zai yuwu ba, aƙalla ba tare da matsa masa lamba daga wani wuri ba. Don haka da alama ba shi ne asalin tushen ra'ayin murkushewa ba, ko da ba da daɗewa ba ya zama mai aiwatar da shi mara tausayi - kodayake muna buƙatar ƙarin sani game da rawar da ya taka a taron wayar tarho na NAS don sanin tabbas.
Hakanan da alama ba zai yiwu a zama mutanen biodefence ba Robert Kadlec, kamar yadda Kadlec ya kasance kuma yana ci gaba da kasancewa mai ba da shawara na lab-leak, kasancewa babban marubucin kwanan nan. a cike da laka Waters Rahoton majalisar dattijai tura ka'idar. An san jami'an tsaron Amurka suna da hannu wajen tura ka'idodin asalin lab tun farkon Janairu 2020. Dalilin da yasa suke yin hakan ba a bayyana cikakke ba, amma yana iya alaƙa da son fenti China a matsayin mugu da haɓaka tsoron ƙwayar cuta a matsayin wakili na halitta don ba da damar kunna ka'idojin kare lafiyar halittu.
Ya dace a ce rikicin da ya barke tsakanin jami’an tsaro da ke ingiza ka’idar asalin lab da kuma murkushe waccan ka’idar da wasu sassan jihar ke yi, da ma a wasu lokutan jami’an tsaro da kansu, na daya daga cikin abubuwan da ke daure kai a kan asalin cutar. Ana iya tunanin, alal misali, cewa mutanen biodefence za su so su kare binciken su na biodefence kuma kada su lalata shi ta hanyar gamsar da kowa cewa kwayar cutar za ta iya fitowa daga irin wannan binciken. Amma da alama wannan ba haka yake ba, ko kaɗan ba duka ba.
To wa zai tafi? Farrar da alama babban wanda ake zargi ne, kamar yadda shi ne wanda da alama ya rinjayi Francis Collins game da mahimmancin guje wa "lalacewar kimiyya da jituwa ta duniya" ta hanyar watsi da asalin lab. Amma duban jerin gayyata ta wayar tarho ta NAS da ke ƙasa yana nuna cewa bai shiga hannu ba (sai dai idan an kwafe shi). Peter Daszak na EcoHealth Alliance yana can, amma me yasa zai sami ikon neman rufawa? Ralph Baric ma yana can, wanda takarda tare da Shi Zhengli na Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan game da sarrafa coronavirus ya firgita Andersen. Amma wane iko zai samu a wannan kungiya?
Wataƙila a sa'an nan kawai tunanin rukuni ne wanda ya karɓi ragamar a yayin taron wayar tarho saboda kuskuren ma'anar buƙata don kare "kimiyya da haɗin kai na duniya." Amma shin da gaske ne tunanin rukuni ya isa ya bayyana irin wannan yunkuri mai ƙarfi da dorewa don murkushe ka'idar?
Duk da ƙoƙarin da aka yi na binciken asalin Covid, wannan mahimmin tambaya ta kasance mai fice. Wanene ya ba da umarnin rufewa?
An sake buga shi daga DailySceptic
