Hujja game da SARS-CoV-2 "labarin leak hypothesis" suna bin littafin wasan ɓoyayyiyar da Johnny Cochran ya yi amfani da shi don juya tarin la'anta akan OJ Simpson zuwa wani laifi. Ayyukan da Johnny ya yi a cikin kotun ya kasance babban darasi kan yadda ake amfani da motsin rai da kuma batanci na kimiyya don gamsar da mutane cewa jami'an 'yan sanda masu bambancin launin fata sun isa wurin da aka kashe a lokuta daban-daban kuma ba tare da bata lokaci ba sun yi makirci don kafa shaidu don sauke OJ.
Yana da matukar ban mamaki cewa masana kimiyya da 'yan siyasa da duk abin da za su yi asara daga lebur na iya shawo kan kowa cewa babu buƙatar yin tambayoyi game da asalin SARS-CoV-2. Wani coronavirus wanda ba a saba da shi ba ya barke daga wannan kasuwa ta musamman (cikin dubun-dubatar China) wanda ya kasance 'yan mil mil daga dakin gwaje-gwajen da ke gina coronaviruses na ɗan adam, don haka rufe! Ba abin mamaki ba ne, bayan lokaci mafi yawan mutane sun daina gaskata Johnny Cochran's bluster. Alhamdu lillahi, yayin da bincike a kusa da leb ɗin ya sake komawa kuma shaida ta bazu, da yawancin mutane (gami da FBI) yanzu yi imani da cutar ta fara a cikin dakin gwaje-gwaje.
An LA Times shafi, wanda marubucin kuma ya yi imanin cewa mutanen da ba a yi musu allurar sun cancanci da, ya dauki harbi wajen rufe muhawarar asalin SARS-CoV-2, yana mai cewa: 1) jami'an kiwon lafiyar jama'a da cibiyoyinsu sun cutar da su ta hanyar "ra'ayin jama'a masu karkata zuwa ga rudani," 2) babu wanda zai iya tallafawa ledar dakin gwaje-gwaje ba tare da gabatar da "babban makirci," 3) tabbatar da ledar dakin gwaje-gwaje na bukatar shaidar cewa Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan (WIV) masana kimiyyar kimiyyar kimiyyar Wuhan ba ta aiki a kan wani kwayar cutar SARS-CoV. zubo.
Dr. Fauci, shugabansa (Dr. Collins), da masu bautar su sun ayyana leb ɗin a matsayin "makirci mai lalata"a farkon annobar cutar, yana haifar da"babban illa mai yuwuwa zuwa ga al’ummar kimiyya da hadin kai na kasa da kasa,” kafin a samu isassun shaidun da za su iya yin kima ko wata hanya. Saboda haka, duk wani abin da ake zargin cewa an yi wa wadannan jami’an kiwon lafiyar jama’a sun yi wa kansu da kansu ne kuma gaba daya sakamakon sha’awarsu ta tilasta wa kowa ra’ayi.
Don masu farawa, SARS-CoV-1 mafi ƙarancin watsawa leaked daga labs a kasashe uku a farkon 2000s. Har ila yau, mun sani daga 2018 Shirin DARPA cewa masu bincike na Amurka da WIV sun kasance suna keɓance (da kuma canza kwayoyin halitta) coronaviruses na jemagu tare da gwada kamuwa da cutar su a cikin tsarin ƙirar ɗan adam a matsayin tushen ƙirƙira riga-kafi na rigakafin cutar zube. Marubutan sun zayyana tsare-tsare na sanya chimeric bat coronaviruses wani babban bangare na aikin ci gaban rigakafin rigakafin su.
Hankali mai sauƙi, ba makirci ba, shine kawai abin da ake buƙata don haɗa aikin farko da suka gudanar a Wuhan don tabbatar da wannan shawarar na miliyoyin daloli da bala'in gobarar daji da ta haifar. coronavirus wanda bai dace da ɗan adam ba. Dr. Fauci kansa ya ce, "Ba kwa so ku je Hoboken, NJ ko Fairfax, VA don yin nazarin fasahar bat-mutum wanda zai iya haifar da fashewa, don haka ku je China."
Yana ba da labari cewa EcoHealth Alliance da abokansu sun yi tsayin daka don musanta shirin binciken "samun-aiki" mai haɗari da ya taɓa wanzuwa, gami da yin ma'anar nasu kalmar. A cewar wata hanyar sadarwa tsakanin mai magana da yawun EcoHealth da Cibiyar Brownstone: "Saboda binciken da ke da alaka da SARS da EcoHealth Alliance da WIV suka yi sun yi maganin coronaviruses na jemage da ba a taɓa nuna su suna cutar da mutane ba, balle a ce suna haifar da mace-mace a cikin mutane, ta ma'anarsa ba samun aikin bincike ba ne."
Fassara: Shirin binciken EcoHealth (wanda aka zayyana a cikin shawarwarin DARPA), wanda a cikinsa suke canza ƙwayoyin jemagu waɗanda ba su dace da ɗan adam ba zuwa ƙwayoyin cuta da suka dace da ɗan adam, ba “samun aiki ba ne.” “Sai-arfafa aiki” ne kawai idan da sun kasance suna mai da ƙwayoyin cuta da suka dace da ɗan adam zuwa ƙwayoyin cuta waɗanda ma sun fi dacewa da ɗan adam. Samu haka?
Ya dace a watsar da shaidar lebur saboda a halin yanzu babu wata hujja da ke nuna cewa masana kimiyyar WIV suna aiki akan ƙwayar cuta ta farko. Mun san cewa gwamnatin kasar Sin cire bayanan kwayar cutar kwayar cutar kwayar cutar daga uwar garken NIH a farkon cutar kuma yana ci gaba da hana shaida daga bincike. Wai, China ta ji tsoron 'yan damfara za su dasa shaidun zagi; Hakanan yana iya yiwuwa ba su yi tsammanin hatsarin dakin gwaje-gwaje ba sannan suka ja bayanan don hana masana kimiyya masu sha'awar gano asalin asalin SARS-CoV-2.
Ko ta yaya, me yasa kasar Sin za ta damu da turawa Labari cewa Sojojin Amurka sun fara cutar idan suna da yakinin cewa kwayar cutar ta fito daga kasuwa? Mun kuma san cewa Dr. Zhou Yusen, wani babban masanin kimiyyar WIV da ke aiki kan rigakafin a farkon cutar, "ya mutu a asirce” ba da dadewa ba bayan neman takardar izinin rigakafin Covid-19.
A fili, ya "fadi daga rufin" na WIV. Wani babban masanin kimiyya wanda zai iya ba da bayanai masu amfani shine an kulle waje nasa lab a farkon cutar. “Rashin daidaituwa” irin waɗannan babu shakka sun hana mu ikon tattara bayanan da suka dace akan ƙwayoyin cuta da aka yi aiki a WIV. A hade, abubuwan da suka faru a Wuhan a farkon barkewar cutar sun ba da dama ga mutane masu hankali suyi muhawara ba tare da kulla makirci ba, kamar yadda marubutan daga littafin. LA Times kuma sau ɗaya mai daraja mujallu da'awar.
Hanya mafi sauƙi don watsar da leb ɗin lab ba tare da muhawara ba shine da'awar babu wata shaida. A gaskiya ma, da shaida yana da ƙarfi, musamman a cikin mahallin duk halayen da ake tuhuma na manyan wadanda ake zargi. Duba Fig 1 da kuma Table 1 don ganin yadda yawancin unicorn SARS-CoV-2 ke cikin dangi na kusa. A halin da ake ciki, taron anti-lab ya yi farin cikin sanya karnukan raccoon a matsayin tushen asalin SARS-CoV-2. Shaidarsu ita ce an gano alamun kwayar cutar (makonni da yawa bayan bullar cutar) a cikin rumfuna a kasuwar Wuhan da ake zargin tana dauke da wadannan dabbobi. Sun kasance cikin jin kunya don ba da rahoton hakan har suka yi watsi da hakan alamun cutar an kuma same su a rumfunan da ke ɗauke da “dabbobin ruwa,” abincin teku, da kayan lambu.
Ba abin mamaki bane, ƙoƙarin ware kakannin daji na SARS-CoV-2, har ma daga namun daji a kusa da Wuhan, sun kasa. A bayyane yake, yana da sauƙin juyi m yarns game da rashin dabi'a na ɗan adam "A" da "B" layi na SARS-CoV-2 da ke fitowa daga kasuwa fiye da yadda ake fita cikin yanayi da swab isassun karnuka raccoon don samar da ko da wata kwakkwarar shaidar cewa akwai nau'in dabba na kwayar cutar.
Domin "Bi ilimin kimiyya," taron anti-lab ɗin yana buƙatar kowa ya yi imani cewa masana kimiyya suna faɗuwa a kai a kai kuma gwamnatocin kama-karya ba sa yin ƙarya ko hana bayanai. Sannan dole ne mu dauki kalmarsu cewa SARS-CoV-2, chimera mai kunshe da kashin kwayar cutar jemage tare da masu karɓar kwayar cutar pangolin mai ɗauke da mahimmanci. Furin cleavage site da alama an samo shi daga sel ɗan adam ko zai yiwu a cat coronavirus, ba zato ba tsammani ya barke cikin duniya a wata kasuwa ta musamman kusa da wani dakin binciken da muka sani yana yin chimeric coronaviruses. Wannan kwayar cutar dodo ta Frankenstein ta bulla ne kawai a Wuhan kuma babu wani wuri tare da dimbin wadatattun dabbobin da ake jigilar su zuwa dubun dubatar kasuwanni a kasar Sin.
Labarin LA Times wanda mutumin da ke son wanda ba a yi masa allurar ya mutu ba ya gargade mu cewa "'yan sociopaths da ke neman kudi ko riba mai ban sha'awa." Mu kuma masu girman kai.
Wannan ya haifar da tambayoyi guda biyu: Wane bangare ne aka sanya wa takunkumi bisa ga umarnin Gwamnatin Tarayya ta kafafen sada zumunta yayin barkewar cutar? Wane bangare ne haramcin binciken "samun-aiki" zai fi cutarwa? Amsoshin waɗannan tambayoyin a bayyane suke ga duk wanda ya mai da hankali. Abin baƙin ciki, labarin da aka yi don rufe tattaunawar asalin ƙwayar cuta ya sa ko da ƙwararren mai ba da labari kamar Johnny Cochran ya zama kamar mai son.
-
Pat Fidopiastis Farfesa ne na Microbiology a Jami'ar Jihar California Polytechnic.
Duba dukkan posts