"Abu na farko da muke yi," in ji Dick the Butcher a cikin wasan kwaikwayon tarihin farko na Shakespeare Henry VI, Sashe na II - "Bari mu kashe duk lauyoyin."
A cikin bayanin Shakespeare, Dick the Butcher sanannen mai cin zarafi ne - kuma lokacin da ya yi kira da a kashe lauyoyi yana taka rawa wajen yin tawaye ga halaltaccen sarki. Don haka mai yiwuwa Justice John Paul Stevens ya sami daidai lokacin, a cikin ra'ayi na 1985, ya fassara layin a matsayin kariyar kai tsaye ga ma'aikatan shari'a: "Shakespeare ya fahimci cewa zubar da lauyoyi mataki ne na tsarin mulkin kama-karya."
To, haka abin yake; kuma Stevens kuma ya gane cewa ba lallai ne ku “kashe duk lauyoyin ba” don “zubar da su” - aƙalla duk lokacin da yawancin sana'ar ta bayyana fiye da farin cikin zubar da kanta.
Amma ina shakka ko Stevens ko wani ya yi tsammanin rashin gaskiya na gundumar Jojiya-lauyan-juya-juya-hujja-mai fafutuka wanda, ta hanyar indicting Donald Trump da akalla hudu daga cikin lauyoyinsa kan zargin cin hanci da rashawa a wannan watan, sun kirkiro wata hanya mai sauki don sanya lauyoyin su bace: kawai a tura su kurkuku (tare da abokan cinikinsu) saboda ba da shawarar ka'idar doka wacce Jam'iyyar Democrat ta ki yarda da ita.
Kuma a: cewa shine "racketeering" da ake zargi a cikin wannan abin da ake kira tuhuma. Laifukan da Trump da mukarrabansa ke zarginsu da aikatawa a gundumar Fulton da ke Georgia kalubalen da suka yi kan sakamakon zaben shugaban kasa na 2020. Babu cin hanci da rashawa, babu boyayyen kwankwaso, babu cin amanar mukamin siyasa don neman alfarma. A'a - "Maƙarƙashiya" da ake zargi duk game da ƙoƙarin da Trump ya yi bai yi nasara ba ne don shawo kan jami'an cewa sakamakon zaben ya lalace da kurakurai, saboda haka, bai kamata a tabbatar da shi a matsayin doka ba. Wato dukan.
Ka manta da jin haushin kafofin watsa labarai game da cikakkun bayanai: wanene ya yi magana da wane da kuma lokacin, wanda ake tuhumar mai ba Trump shawara kan abin da'awar "lalata", da sauransu. Muhimmin batu game da wannan tuhumar shi ne ana tuhumar lauyoyi da aikata laifuka don yin aikin doka. Wani mai gabatar da kara na Amurka yana aikata laifukan shari'a - kasuwancin da zai iya ƙare kawai tare da "nau'i na gwamnati" wanda matakan farko na Justice Stevens ya gano tare da kawar da lauyoyi.
Ina fata da gaske wani a cikin kasuwancin ya gaya wa Ms. Fani Willis (wanda a halin yanzu ke baking a cikin mintuna goma sha biyar na daukakar kafofin watsa labarai a matsayin mai gabatar da kara ga Trump's Sisera) cewa idan kun sanya shi babban laifi don bayar da hujjojin shari'a da ba su yi nasara ba, kun sanya shi kusan ba zai yiwu ba don bayar da hujjojin shari'a na asali kwata-kwata.
Amma a lokacin, na sha fatan cewa kafofin watsa labaru na yau da kullun suna da kashin baya don yin magana game da tuhumar Julian Assange, bisa dalilin cewa idan an kulle Assange don yin hakan. abin da duk 'yan jarida masu bincike ke yi ba za a ƙara yin aikin jarida na bincike ba. Kuma duk da haka, “’yan jarida” masu farin jini a fili ba su bayar da wata qa’ida ba game da rugujewar aikin jarida, matuqar an yi ta a hidimar masu iko. Kuma a fili suna jin haka game da gurfanar da lauyoyi don yin abin da lauyoyi ke yi - kawai kuyi tunanin Clarence Darrow "Nietzsche ya sa su yi" shaida a madadin Leopold da Loeb - muddin dai kan Donald Trump ne a kan toshe. The New York Times kwanan nan ya buga “baƙon muƙala” yana mai kiran Ms. Willis' ɓarna mai shafi 98 “m. " Kuma, Brute?
Amma ainihin labarin shi ne rashin tsoro na lauyoyin kasa. Yakamata su tashi en masse don yin tir da tuhumar da ake yi masa – kamar yadda ya kamata duk ‘yan jarida da editocin su su rika ihu daga saman rufin asiri suna goyon bayan Assange. Bayan haka, kowane lauya yana da alhakin kare tsarin shari'a daga yin zagon kasa. Kuma duk abin da kuke tunani game da Trump (ni kaina kadan game da shi), wannan tuhumar wani yunkuri ne na rashin hankali na kawar da tsarin zabe na sa ido kan shari'a ta hanyar aikata laifukan kalubale na shari'a ga sakamakon zabe. Kawar da duk maganganun da ba a so da kuma maimaita bayanai masu ban mamaki, kuma abin da ya rage na tuhumar shi ne da'awar cewa Trump da lauyoyinsa masu laifi ne saboda - kuma kawai saboda - sun ba gwamnati da kotuna ka'idar doka mai rarrafe don kalubalantar sakamakon zaben shugaban kasa na 2020.
Idan za a iya yanke musu hukunci cewa, bin doka a tsarin siyasar Amurka ya ƙare. Yana da sauƙi - kuma mai tsanani.
Ka tuna, ba ni da wani taƙaitaccen bayani game da takamaiman muhawarar waɗannan lauyoyin - Kenneth Chesebro, John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani, et al. – a zahiri gabatar. Shari'ar tasu ta kasance nau'i-nau'i na ka'idoji na shari'a masu ban sha'awa da kuma tatsuniyoyi, kuma ban yi mamakin cewa ya gaza ba. A gaskiya, ba zan yi mamakin Trump da kamfani ba. an buƙaci su biya kuɗin shari'a na abokan adawar su a gaban kotu - maganin da doka ta tanada lokacin da hujjojin lauyoyi sun fi ƙirƙira fiye da sahihanci.
Amma abu daya ne alkali ya yi watsi da kokarin da wasu lauyoyin suka yi na kare matsayin wanda ya ke karewa. Bambanci ne gaba ɗaya a yi musu barazana da yanke musu hukunci saboda sun ɓata wata ƙungiya mai ƙarfi ta siyasa - a wannan yanayin, Jam'iyyar Democrat. Muhawarar shari'a - da shan kashi - wani bangare ne na ingantacciyar al'ummar dimokuradiyya. Laifin ƙalubalen shari'a ga tsarin siyasa shine makamin maƙiyan da suka rantse na gwamnatin tsarin mulki, ko sunayensu Dick the Butcher, Adolf Hitler, Joe Biden, ko Fani Willis.
Shin hakan yana da tsauri sosai? To, yi la'akari da sakin layi a cikin tuhumar Willis game da ƙoƙarin lauyoyin Trump na shawo kan Mataimakin Shugaban kasa Mike Pence ya ƙi tabbatar da ƙuri'un da mambobin Kwalejin Zaɓe suka jefa wa Biden. A cewar tuhumar, wannan kokarin - saboda ya saba wa wasu abubuwan da ake kira dokar kidayar kuri'u - ba komai ba ne illa wani laifi da ya yi na ci gaba da kulla makirci.
Amma a ina hakan zai bar wa] annan mambobin Majalisar da a cikin Janairu 2001 suka yi ƙoƙari su shawo kan Mataimakin Shugaban Kasa Al Gore ya ƙi kuri'un Kwalejin Za ~ e na goyon bayan George W. Bush? Wannan yunkurin kuma, ya sabawa doka – saboda koke-koken da wakilan Majalisar suka gabatar ba su da sa hannun Sanatan Amurka. Wata ‘yar majalisa a zahiri ta bayyana cewa ba ta damu da ko karar ta na dauke da sa hannun da ake bukata ba – wanda mataimakin shugaban kasar ya amsa cikin jin dadi, “To, doka ta damu.” Amma babu wani a cikin manema labarai da ya kira koke na 'yan Democrat "karya" ko "jabu;" babu wanda ya zargi wakilan Demokradiyya da kokarin "sata" zaben; kuma babu wanda ya yi mafarkin tuhumar kowanne daga cikinsu da laifin yin tsayuwar daka na karshe a kan zaben da suke tunanin an yanke masa hukuncin da bai dace ba.
Amma ba za ku iya samun ta hanyoyi biyu ba. Idan Trump, Giuliani, Eastman, da Chesebro masu laifi ne saboda sun bukaci Mike Pence da ya yi watsi da ka'idojin doka a 2021, to duk 'yan jam'iyyar Democrat wadanda suka gabatar da kararrakin adawa da Bush a zauren Majalisa a 2001 suma masu laifi ne. Kuma lauya na gaba wanda yayi la'akari da ƙin yarda da doka game da wasu sakamakon zaɓe na gaba zai san hakan he na iya fuskantar kamawa, da kuma tuhume-tuhume, idan masu rinjaye daga baya suka ayyana hujjojinsa "an karyata." Shin tsarin zaɓe na dimokuradiyya zai iya rayuwa a cikin yanayin da ke azabtar da ƙalubalen shari'a zuwa ga kuskuren da aka gane? Ban san wani mai sharhi da ya yi iƙirarin cewa za a iya amincewa da zaɓe don gudanar da kansu ba tare da sa ido a kan shari’a ba. Kuma sa idon na shari'a ya dogara, dole, akan samuwar matakin shari'a na sirri.
To ina ɗimbin lauyoyin da suka fusata suke yin tir da tuhumar Willis? Ina shugabannin kungiyar lauyoyi, wadanda har yanzu suke da ra'ayin jama'a kan kowane batu? Ina malaman shari'a suke buga op-eds a cikin jaridu na yau da kullun don faɗakar da mu game da barazanar da wannan tuhumar ke haifarwa ga tsarin tsarin mulkin jamhuriya?
Ana iya samun ma'anar shuru ɗaya a cikin Times ' rubutun baƙo da na ambata riga - wanda ya yi nasarar ƙaddamar da shafukan 98 na aikin hack na siyasa a matsayin "haƙiƙa" hujjar doka. Wannan maƙalar ta danganta yaƙin shari'a da ke gabatowa a gundumar Fulton da gwajin wasan kwaikwayo wanda ake kira "Kwamitin 6 ga Janairu" - ɓarna da na rubuta game da shi. kafin. Kwatancen yana da koyarwa. Kwamitin na 6 ga Janairu ya bayyana sakamakonsa tun ma kafin a fara gudanar da ayyukansa a hukumance - kuma daga cikin wadannan shawarwarin har da nuna kyama ga duk wani yunkuri na kalubalantar zaben shugaban kasa na 2020 a matsayin wani hari kan kasar kanta. Ms. Willis mai yiwuwa ta yi niyyar gudanar da nata gwajin wasan kwaikwayo a irin wannan salon, kuma 'yan jarida masu sassaucin ra'ayi sun shirya tsaf don tafiya tare. Ba lauyoyi da yawa ne ke sha'awar a ba su horo a kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun a matsayin maciya amana ko masu zagon kasa.
Amma ina ganin akwai wani dalili kuma, don fahimtarsa, akwai bukatar a fahimci rugujewar siyasa ta ma'aikatan shari'ar Amurka, tsarin da ya kara tsananta cikin shekaru ashirin da suka gabata. Kamar yadda a gulmar lauyoyi Samar da aikin neman aikin shari'a yana ƙara wahala, ƙungiyoyin lauyoyi da sauran ƙungiyoyin lauyoyi (kusan duk waɗanda ke karkata zuwa hagu) sun yi amfani da damar don tilastawa. gwaje-gwajen akida a matsayin hanyar cin nasara, ko aƙalla, lauyoyi masu ra'ayin da ba a so.
Tasirin sun kasance a bayyane sosai. Don haka, “tattaunawar kwamiti” na baya-bayan nan da kungiyar Lauyoyin City ta New York ta dauki nauyinsa game da “iko da lauyoyi” ba ta taba ambaton ci gaban dimokuradiyyar wakilai ba yayin juyin mulkin COVID ko kuma Shugaba Biden na keta hakkin doka na Nuremberg. A maimakon haka, masu magana da yawun sun koka kan yadda wasu lauyoyin New York suka goyi bayan yakin neman zaben Trump. A wannan makon, wannan ƙungiya tana tallata wani taron "wanda aka tsara bisa ra'ayin cewa lauyoyi za su iya kuma ya kamata su taka muhimmiyar rawa wajen yaƙar sauyin yanayi."
A takaice dai, duk inda babban ra'ayin sassaucin ra'ayi ya yi rinjaye, ana sa ran lauyoyi su zama masu ƙorafi a cikin injina waɗanda ke ci gaba da tura mu gaba ɗaya kusa da kama-karya. Kuma indoctrination da alama yana aiki: ƙananan lauyoyi sun ƙi amincewa da kwamitin 6 ga Janairu ya nuna gwaji; kuma ya zuwa yanzu, aƙalla, mutum zai iya ƙidaya akan yatsun hannun hannu ɗaya lauyoyin da suka kira Willis tuhume-tuhumen abin da yake: kai hari ga gwamnatin tsarin mulki.
Wataƙila wasu daga cikin waɗannan lauyoyin da suka yi shiru ba su ji daɗin abin da ke faruwa a asirce ba, kuma suna fatan idan sun ɗan jira komai zai tafi. Amma ina jin tsoron duk wani bege irin wannan yana cikin ɓata mai haɗari. ’Yan ta’adda ba sa ja da baya; akasin haka, sun sami kwarin gwiwa da karfin gwiwa a cikin shekaru ukun da suka gabata. Duk dabarun ta'addanci da lalata dimokiradiyya da muka gani tun daga 2020 mai yiwuwa ne kawai su hanzarta cikin jerin sabbin maganganu: wata kwayar cuta, "canjin yanayi," tashin hankali a cikin "kalaman kiyayya," "fararen fata" - jerin za a iya tsawaita kusan har abada.
Don haka ba za a sami mafi kyawun lokacin yin rajistar ƙin yarda ba. Idan kuna kula da amincin tsarin shari'ar Amurka, kuma musamman idan kai lauya ne da kanku (kamar yadda ni), yanzu shine lokacin magana. Idan muka jira har sai lauyoyin Trump duk suna gidan yari, za mu iya ganin mun dade sosai. Eh, yau shine kan lemu na Trump akan toshe. Amma gobe za mu iya fuskantar barazanar fuskantar kanmu don tuhumar mu don faɗin abin da ba daidai ba, goyon bayan abin da bai dace ba, ko ma tunanin munanan tunani.
Kuma lokacin da kwatankwacinmu na zamani na Dick the Butcher ya yi tsawa, “Bari mu kashe duk lauyoyi!” – ina za mu kasance idan mai son mulkin kama-karya da yake ba shi shawara zai iya waiwaya masa baya ya ce, “Lauyoyi? Wane lauyoyi?”
-
Michael Lesher marubuci ne, mawaki kuma lauya wanda aikinsa na shari'a ya fi sadaukar da kai ga batutuwan da suka danganci cin zarafin gida da cin zarafin yara. Littafin Littattafai na Lincoln Square ya buga wani abin tunawa game da bincikensa na addinin Yahudanci na Orthodox a matsayin babban mutum - Juya Baya: Tafiya ta Bayahude "Sake Haihuwa" a watan Satumba 2020. Ya kuma buga op-ed guda a cikin wurare daban-daban kamar su Gaba, ZNet, New York Post da Off-Guardian.
Duba dukkan posts
