Ina da tsohuwar LP akan tebur yanzu, wasan kwaikwayon Philharmonic na Berlin na 1985 na Tchaikovsky's 1812 Overture. An yi rikodin kusan shekaru 40 kafin mamayewar Rasha a Ukraine, kusan shekaru 40 bayan da Jamus ta mamaye birnin Leningrad, katangar Berlin har yanzu tana nan, ba ta ƙarewa, a daidai lokacin yaƙin cacar baka. Babban kiɗan Rasha, wanda aka haɗa don tunawa da wani yaƙi tsakanin Gabas da Yamma, wanda mashahurin ƙungiyar makaɗa ta Jamus ta Yamma ya yi; tsofaffin abokan gaba, sannan kuma har yanzu abokan gaba, amma sun haɗu ta hanyar fasaha.
Makonni kadan da suka gabata, kungiyar Orchestra ta Cardiff Philharmonic soke soke wani wasan kwaikwayo na Tchaikovsky, yana kiran shi "bai dace ba a wannan lokacin." A duk Yammacin Turai, an soke masu fasaha na Rasha kuma an kori wasu daga ayyukansu.
A cikin 1984 Grant labarin, "Yamma ko Al'ada da aka sace, "Milan Kundera ya bayyana al'adun Turai kamar yadda ya ke da "ikon tunani, shakkun mutum da kuma a kan wani zane-zane wanda ya bayyana bambancinsa." Sabanin haka "babu wani abu da zai iya zama baƙon waje zuwa tsakiyar Turai da sha'awar iri-iri fiye da Rasha: uniform, daidaitawa, daidaitawa, ƙaddara don canza kowace al'umma ta daularta… a cikin al'ummar Rasha guda ɗaya… a kan iyakar Gabas ta Yamma - fiye da ko'ina - Rasha ana ganinta ba kawai a matsayin wani ikon Turai ba amma a matsayin wayewa guda ɗaya, wata wayewa. "
Labarin ya haifar da muhawara tsakanin Kundera da mawaƙin Rasha kuma ɗan adawa Joseph Brodsky, wanda ya yi ƙarfi. tsayayya Ra'ayoyin Kundera. Asalin wayewar Turai, a cewar Brodsky, ba halin yau da kullun na Yammacin Turai ba ne, al'adar da ta rasa dangantaka da tushenta, amma Kiristanci. Yaƙin na gaskiya shine "tsakanin bangaskiya da tsarin amfani da rayuwa."
Yanzu mun ga wannan takaddama ta farfado; kalli kwanan nan muhawara tsakanin Bernard-Henri Lévy da Aleksandr Dugin. Irin wannan tashin hankali ne tsakanin sabanin ra'ayi na duniya kuma babu shakka zai kara karfi. Domin duniya yanzu tana canzawa, yayin da muke rayuwa a cikin lokuta masu ban sha'awa sau ɗaya. Kuma tabbas ra'ayin Brodsky zai sami ƙarin fa'ida, ba tare da dalili ba; Mun ga shi a fili cikin shekaru biyun da suka gabata yadda sauƙi mai tunani mai shakka, tushen al'ummar Yammacin Yamma, ya maye gurbinsa da firgita masu biyayya.
Kamar yadda aka nuna a cikin labarin kwanan nan a dalili, Tchaikovsky ya kasance “daya daga cikin mawaƙa na farko kuma kaɗai na Rasha da suka guje wa kishin ƙasar Rasha kuma suka ƙaunaci waƙarsa ga Yamma, ya zama abin da masana tarihi da yawa za su yi la’akari da ɗaya daga cikin ƴan gada tsakanin fasahar Rasha da Turai.” Wannan ya fito fili ga ƙungiyar makaɗa ta Berlin a 1985.
Amma a yau ba mu ga wani bambanci tsakanin Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky da Vladimir Putin ba. Babu wani bambanci tsakanin mawaƙin da ɗan adam mai goyon bayan Yammacin Yamma da wakilin KGB ya juya baya. Na karshen ya mamaye Ukraine. Don haka kada a yi kidan tsohon. Me yasa? Domin sun kasance kasa daya kuma suna magana da yare daya. Mutum ba ya da wani abu kuma, kawai abin da ya shafi sansanin; duniya ce baki da fari.
Mamayewar da Napoleon ya yi wa Rasha a shekara ta 1812 na daya daga cikin manyan bala'o'i a tarihin yaki. Kashi shida na sojojin Faransa 600,000 ne suka tsira. Rasha ta yi asarar sama da 200,000. Kusan shekaru 140 bayan haka, mamayewar da Hitler ya yi wa Rasha bala'i ne mai girman gaske. Napoleon da Hitler ’yan ta’adda ne da suka yi wa abokin hamayyarsu mummunar hukunci, suka kai hari a wata kasa da ke makwabtaka da su kuma suka sha kashi mai wulakanci. Kamar yadda mutane da yawa suka yi imani da yiwuwar Putin zai kasance a Ukraine yanzu.
Kamar yadda Tolstoy in War kuma aminci ya tabbata, ko da a lokacin da aka yi yaƙi da Napoleon babu wani canji a cikin sadaukarwar Rasha ga al'adun Faransanci. Sarakunan ba su daina magana da Faransanci ba. Ba a kori mawakan Faransa da masu koyarwa masu zaman kansu ba. Ba a kona littattafan Faransanci.
A lokacin, har yanzu mutane sun san kuma sun fahimci bambancin al'ada da siyasa. Sun san fasaha ba ta da 'yanci daga 'yan kasa, darajarta ba ta dogara ga wanda ke mulkin kasar da aka samar da ita ba, kuma ba za a iya gurbata ta ko da ta'addancin yaki ba; yana sama da ma'auni.
Amma irin wannan shawara ba ma ba mu mamaki ba a yanzu. Mun saba da yadda ake soke masu fasaha, marubuta da mawaka, ana tantance ayyukansu, saboda dalilan da ba su da alaka da fasaharsu. Mun yi matukar kaduwa da halin Putin kuma muna jin tausayin wadanda aka ji wa rauni ko aka kashe yanzu. Za mu iya goyi bayan tsauraran takunkumi har ma da zargi mutanen Rasha don rashin kawar da kansu daga wurin zama. Amma ba tare da yawaitar halin yanzu da cikakkiyar buƙatun son rai na rayuwa ba tare da haɗari da ƙalubale ba, ba tare da tunani da nauyi ba; a cikin ma'anarsa gaba da al'adun gaskiya; yaki ko babu yaki, da Cardiff Philharmonic ba za su soke taronsu na Tchaikovsky ba.
Domin babban fasaha ya haɗa mu, a kan iyakoki da ƙasashe. Ba ta yadda ’yan iska ke haɗe da mafi ƙasƙanci ba; yana haɗa mu a matsayin mutane masu tunani. Yana iya haifar da yanayi mai wuyar gaske, yana iya tilasta mana mu sake yin la'akari da imaninmu, rayuwarmu, kuma a ƙarshe wannan shine ainihin ƙimarsa. Kuma a lokacin yaki, ya kamata a yi bikin fasaha, ba wai a ce a ce ba.
Taken Tchaikovsky's Overture na 1812 wani lamari ne mai ban tsoro da gaske wanda ya faru lokacin da ma'aikaci ya rasa ma'anarsa ta gaskiya. Daidai saboda wannan, yin shi bai taɓa dacewa ba fiye da yanzu, yayin da wani ɓarna ya wuce gona da iri. Rashin fahimtar wannan yana nufin mun rasa dangantakarmu da ainihin dabi'un da muke ayyana al'adunmu da su. A wurinsu muna da "satin kiyayya" kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin Orwell's 1984. Yanzu an sadaukar da shi ga kiɗan Tchaikovsky.
Tunanin Kundera da shakkun mutum ba zai taɓa shiga cikin “makon ƙiyayya ba,” ba za su taɓa yin la’akari da masu fasahar al’umma ba, duk irin zaluncin da masu mulkinta suka yi. A maimakon haka zai ci gaba da adawa da rundunonin duhu, kuma ainihin rundunonin guda ɗaya ne da ke kwance bayan cin zarafi na ɓarna da zalunci na soke taron.
To, me za mu iya yi? Abin da zan yi kawai na sani. Zan ci gaba da sauraron Tchaikovsky, a cikin ɓatanci na sirri na barasa, ko wanene su da kuma duk inda suka fito.
-
Thorsteinn Siglaugsson mashawarcin Icelandic ne, ɗan kasuwa kuma marubuci kuma yana ba da gudummawa akai-akai ga The Daily Skeptic har ma da wallafe-wallafen Icelandic daban-daban. Ya yi digiri na BA a fannin falsafa da MBA daga INSEAD. Thorsteinn ƙwararren ƙwararren ƙwararren ƙwararren ne a cikin Theory of Constraints kuma marubucin Daga Alamu zuwa Dalilai - Aiwatar da Tsarin Tunanin Hankali zuwa Matsala ta Kullum.
Duba dukkan posts
