Kamar yadda fasfo ɗin rigakafin Covid-19 da umarni sannu a hankali ya ɓace a baya, yanzu lokaci ne na hisabi, kuma ga mafi yawan masu adawa da matakan Covid-19 babu tambaya wanda, sama da duka, ya kamata a biya: wato, Pfizer, wanda ya kera maganin rigakafin cutar sankara wanda ya zama madaidaicin je-zuwa rigakafin Covid-19 a ko'ina cikin Yamma.
Ko, a wasu kalmomi, #PfizerLiedPeopleDied, kamar yadda sanannen hashtag na Twitter ya sanya shi.
Amma matsalar wannan shine Pfizer shine ba a gaskiya ma'aikacin maganin da ake tambaya. Ee, yana da nau'ikan digiri daban-daban da ke da alhakin tsarin sarrafa shi don yawancin kasuwanni (ko da yake ba duka ba). Amma ko da yaushe yana kera shi a madadin wani kamfani, wanda a matsayin hujjar doka shine ainihin (mai shi da) masana'anta: wato, kamfanin Jamus BioNTech.
Ta yaya zan san wannan? To, saboda ya faɗi haka daidai akan lakabin kartani! Duba ƙasa.
"Kera ta." "An kera don." Menene zai iya zama mafi bayyane? Pfizer ɗan kwangilar BioNTech ne.
Alamar samfurin kwanan nan ta amfani da sunan kasuwanci na "Comirnaty" yana rarraba tare da "by" da "don" da adireshin Pfizer gaba ɗaya kuma, yayin da cikin ladabi har yanzu ya haɗa da tambarin Pfizer, kawai yana nuna BioNTech a matsayin masana'anta.
Wannan ya yi daidai da al'adar Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya da masu kula da su a duk duniya, waɗanda su ma sun gano BioNTech, ba Pfizer ba, a matsayin mai yin rigakafin "Pfizer-BioNTech".
Dubi nan, alal misali, daga MHRA's "Bayani ga masu karɓa na Burtaniya kan rigakafin Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19".
nan daga Health Canada.
nan daga FDA.
kuma nan, a karshe, daga Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya. (EUL tana nufin “Jerin Amfani da Gaggawa.”)
(Abin sha'awa, EU tana wakiltar wani keɓancewa a wannan batun; takaddun ƙa'idodi sun bayyana kamfanoni biyu a matsayin "masu sana'a," amma koyaushe suna nuna matsayin BioNTech azaman Mai riƙe Izinin Talla. Takaddun EU, kamar alamun da aka sake bugawa a sama, ko dai suna ƙayyade cewa an kera magungunan “ta” Pfizer “don” BioNTech ko kuma kawai jera BioNTech azaman masana'anta.)
Wannan fifikon BioNTech a cikin masana'antar magungunan kuma an yi amfani da shi, ba abin mamaki ba, a cikin tsarin ba da izini. Wanda ya dauki nauyin kuma "jam'iyyar da ke da alhakin" don gwajin asibiti wanda ya kasance abin zargi da suka da yawa shine BioNTech, ba Pfizer ba. The shigarwar gwaji na asibiti kawai ya lissafa Pfizer a matsayin "mai haɗin gwiwa."
Pfizer ya gudanar da gwajin, amma ya yi haka a madadin BioNTech: a matsayin ɗan kwangila, kamar yadda yake a cikin tsarin masana'antu.
Kuma lokacin da aka faɗi duka kuma an gama, kamar yadda na riga ya lura shekara daya da rabi da suka wuce, BioNTech ne, ba Pfizer ba, wanda ya sami cikakkiyar amincewa daga FDA don abin da ke, bayan haka, maganin sa. saman da aikace-aikacen lasisin halittu an nuna a kasa. Mai nema shine BioNTech, Pfizer kawai yayi aiki a matsayin wakilin Amurka na kamfanin Jamus.
Don haka, me yasa sanannun sanannun FOIA's "Takardun Pfizer" daga tsarin ba da izini har ma ake kira "takardun Pfizer?" Ko da a lokacin da suke kan wasiƙar Pfizer ko kuma an buga tambarin "sirri na Pfizer," rawar da Pfizer ke taka a cikin tsarin koyaushe shine ɗan kwangila ko wakili - kuma da yawa hakika suna kan wasiƙar BioNTech da/ko an buga tambarin "sirri - kadarorin BioNTech." Ya kamata a san su da "Takardun BioNTech."
Kuma me yasa shima sanannen ƙarar masu fallasa ƙarar da ke tuhumar Pfizer da zamba bai ma ambaci sunan wanda ya ɗauki nauyin shari'ar ba (da kuma "jam'iyyar da ke da alhaki")!
Ko nufin ko a'a, sakamakon rashin kakkausar murya ga Pfizer shine ɓoye abin da ke bayyane: wato, cewa samfurin BioNTech ne kuma BioNTech ne, ba Pfizer ba, ya kasance. babban mai cin gajiyar kamfani na ƙirƙira da gwamnati fiat na babbar kasuwar rigakafin Covid-19.
Kuma idan har za a gane wannan, watau kawai gani, zai iya haifar da tambayoyi akai-akai game da duk sauran fitattun alaƙar Jamusanci da cutar ta Covid-19 da martanin cutar: daga shigar da masu binciken Jamusanci A cikin binciken kwayar cutar ba wani ba face Wuhan, China, ga ci gaban saurin walƙiya ta babban masanin ilimin virologist na Jamus Christian Drosten na ƙa'idar PCR wacce ta tabbatar da cewa barkewar cutar ta Covid-19 za ta sami matsayin "cututtuka", zuwa ga mafi rinjayen tallafin Jamusawa na kasafin kudin martani na WHO na Covid-19.
-
Robert Kogon shi ne sunan alkalami na wani ɗan jarida da ake bugawa da yawa wanda ke yin rubuce-rubuce kan al'amuran Turai.
Duba dukkan posts
