'Labarin shekaru goma,' 'bin bindigar shan taba,' 'harka rufe.' Labarin tallafin Amurka - ko kuma, kamar yadda lamarin ya kasance, ko da ba a ba da tallafi ba - bincike-binciken riba kan coronaviruse an gabatar da shi sosai a cikin 'yan makonnin nan a matsayin mafita ga kacici-kacici na Covid: ba wai kawai tabbataccen hujja ba cewa an halicci SARS-CoV-2 a cikin dakin gwaje-gwaje, bayan duka, har ma da kusan tabbataccen zanga-zangar whodunnit.
Amurkawa sun yi, ba shakka. Ko kuma"mun yi", kamar yadda Jim Haslam, Ba'amurke Substacker wanda ya kirkiro mafi kyawun sigar wannan ka'idar, ya sanya shi: Anthony Fauci, mai ba da gudummawar binciken; Ralph Baric, 'mai tsara' kwayar cutar; da Peter Daszak, shugaban Burtaniya na EcoHealth Alliance na Amurka, wanda ya jagoranci binciken. a cikin mutumin Vincent Munster, wanda ya sanya kwayar cutar ta Baric ta yadu a Fauci's Rocky Mountain Lab a Montana kafin a tura ta zuwa Wuhan. Sauran kuma tarihi ne.
Amma menene game da duk haɗin gwiwar Jamus da binciken ƙwayar cuta a Wuhan wanda na rubuta nan, nan, nan da kuma nan kuma wanda ya ƙunshi ba Jamusanci kaɗai ba kudade don binciken kwayar cutar a Wuhan, amma hakika cikakken dakin gwaje-gwaje na Jamusanci da China a Wuhan, wanda - sabanin Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan - tana daidai a yankin da aka fara barkewar Covid-19 a cikin birni?
Yana da mahimmanci cewa ana yin watsi da waɗannan haɗin gwiwar Jamusawa cewa labarin da ake zaton 'Ba'amurke' na ƙirƙira da sakin Covid-19 yana nuna daidai gare su: wato, ga Bajamushe ko, mafi daidai, haɗin binciken coronavirus na Jamus da Dutch, wanda ya taka muhimmiyar rawa a cikin martanin Covid-19 kuma a cibiyar ba mu sami kowa ba face Kirista Drosten. Drosten shine, ba shakka, mahaliccin Bajamushe ne na sanannen gwajin cutar da jama'a na Covid-19 PCR wanda shine ainihin tushen ayyana cutar.
Bari mu fara da abin da aka bayyana a matsayin Anthony Fauci's Rocky Mountain Lab, inda Vincent Muster ya kamata ya sanya ƙirar ƙwayoyin cuta ta Baric ke yaduwa. Kanun labaran a Daily Mail Labari har ma ya siffanta shi a matsayin laburar “Fauci-run”. To, duk da cewa haƙiƙa cibiyar bincike ce ta NIAID kuma har ta kai ga alaƙa da tsohon darektan NIAID Fauci, ainihin darektan wurin da kanta Masanin ilimin halittu na Jamus Heinz Feldmann ne.
"To me?" - za ku iya cewa. Akwai Jamusawa miliyan 80. Gaskiya ya isa. Amma babu Jamusawa miliyan 80 da suka gudanar binciken kwayar cutar tare da Christian Drosten.
Lallai, ban da Feldmann da Drosten, akwai wasu mashahuran marubuta guda biyu na wannan takarda da aka ambata a sama na cutar Ebola ta 2011: Vincent Munster, ma'aikacin Feldmann a Dutsen Rocky Lab wanda ba ya buƙatar ƙarin gabatarwa a nan, da Stefan Pöhlmann, masanin ilimin virologist wanda ke Cibiyar Farko ta Jamus a Göttingen. Kamar Drosten, Pöhlmann ya shiga cikin sanannen kiran taron 1 ga Fabrairu 2020 tare da Anthony Fauci akan yuwuwar leb ɗin SARS-CoV-2. Kamar yadda za a gani na ɗan lokaci, daidai abin da za a iya kira 'ma'aikatan EU' a kusa da Drosten, kuma ya haɗa da Pöhlmann, wanda zai yi ƙoƙarin kawar da hasashe a cikin tattaunawar da takwarorinsu na Anglosphere, duka akan kira da imel da suka biyo baya.
Likitan Bajamushe kuma masanin ilimin halittar jini Johanna Deinert na ɗaya daga cikin na farko da ya nuna alaƙar Jamusawa da yawa ga binciken ƙwayar cuta wanda wataƙila ya ba da gudummawa ga asalin dakin gwaje-gwaje na SARS-CoV-2. Ita @DeinertDoc An dakatar da asusun Twitter a tsohon tsarin mulki kuma ba a taba maido da shi ba a karkashin sabon. Wanda ba a sani ba Bakwai na Tara, MD Asusun X ya ɗauki yawancin jigogi iri ɗaya.
A cikin wani X thread, Bakwai na Nine, MD ya rubuta cewa Feldmann "ya mallaki SARS1 genome tare da Frank Plummer via lamban kira, halitta jemage cell Lines a 2011. A SARS-CoV-2 mun sami abun da ake sakawa zuwa Plummer (2015/2017) da B. Korber (2011)". Yana ambaton takardan da ke sama kuma yana nufin aikin bincike a Lab ɗin Rocky Mountain wanda ya haɗa da jemagu na 'ya'yan itace da ƙwayar cuta mai kama da 'SARS', Bakwai na Tara, MD ya ƙara da cewa: "An haɓaka al'adun ƙwayoyin jemagu na 'ya'yan itace ba tare da haɗin gwiwar wani ba face Christian Drosten da Stefan Pöhlmann."
(Bakwai na tara, asusun MD X yana da kariya. Masu karatu za su bi asusun don samun damar duba abubuwan da aka ambata. Za a iya tuntuɓar ikon mallakar da aka ambata. nan.)
Ya kamata a tuna da shi daga FOIA'd'Fauci imel' cewa bayan da aka fara tayar da mai kallon wani dakin gwaje-gwaje na SARS-CoV-2 tare da Fauci ta Kristian Andersen, Jeremy Farrar na Wellcome Trust zai shirya shahararren kiran taron na 1 ga Fabrairu, yana kawo wata ƙungiyar Jamus-Dutch na ƙwararrun coronavirus don tattauna batun tare da abokan aikinsu na Anglosphere.
Masana kimiyyar Anglosphere da suka damu sune Robert Garry, Andrew Rambaut, Edward Holmes, da masanin ilimin halittar dan adam Andersen, wanda, duk da haka, ya dogara ne akan Binciken Scripps a California. Dukkansu suna zargin cewa kwayar cutar ta samo asali ne ko kuma sun gamsu cewa ta yi. Ko da Farrar, wanda ya yi watsi da batun leburori a cikin bayanansa na jama'a, ya ce ya kasance "50-50" tsakanin ruwan leb da asalin halitta a bayan fage.
Amma mambobi ne na ƙungiyar EU da Jamus da Holland waɗanda aka ruwaito sun caccaki Andersen da takwarorinsa na Anglosphere a kan kiran taron kuma za su ci gaba da yin kira, a cikin wasiƙun da suka biyo baya, cewa batun ya kasance, a cikin kalmomin Drosten.
Mun riga mun lura da alaƙar Heinz Feldmann da membobin Jamus biyu na ƙungiyar EU, Christian Drosten da Stefan Pöhlmann. Sauran mambobi biyu na ƙungiyar sune ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwayoyin cuta na Holland Marion Koopmans da Ron Fouchier.
Koopmans shi ne shugaban Sashen Viroscience na Cibiyar Kiwon Lafiya ta Jami'ar Erasmus kuma mawallafin Drosten takardar yarjejeniya ta PCR. Masu bi walƙiya-sauri na awa 24 'bitun takwarorinsu,' Mujallar da ke samun tallafin EU ce ta buga takardar Euro sa ido sati daya kacal kafin kiran taron. Fouchier ba kowa ba ne illa na Turai kuma watakila ya fi shahara ko rashin mutunci a duniya, ya danganta da mahanga ta mutum, mai binciken riba. Shi ne mataimakin Koopman a Sashen Nazarin Viroscience na Cibiyar Kiwon Lafiya ta Erasmus, Rotterdam. Shi ne kuma abokin aikin marubucin 2003 SARS-CoV-1 takarda wanda, a cikin kalmomin Bakwai na Nine, MD, "ya ƙaddamar da aikin Drosten."
Don haka, menene hakan ke da alaƙa da zargin Vincent Munster na SAR-CoV-2 a Feldmann's (ba Fauci's) Rocky Mountain Lab? To, Munster dalibin Fouchier ne! Fouchier shine babban darektan Munster's PhD thesis (kamar yadda ake iya gani nan), tare da Ab Osterhaus, wanda watakila shine mabuɗin tarihi a cikin samuwar haɗin gwiwar virology na Jamus da Holland. Osterhaus shi ne shugaban Sashen Kimiyyar Jiki a Cibiyar Kiwon Lafiya ta Erasmus Rotterdam har zuwa 2014, lokacin da Koopmans ya gaje shi. Dan kasar Holland mai shekaru 75 a yanzu yana kan gaba rukunin aiki na 'Kiwon Lafiya Daya' Yin Karatu a University of Veterinary Medicine a Hanover.
(A cikin saƙon Slack na 9 ga Fabrairu, bayan lura da yuwuwar sakin kwayar cutar ta bazata, Robert Garry ya rubuta: "Ku kira ni maƙarƙashiya…
Koopmans ko Pöhlmann ba ya bayyana sun taka rawar gani a cikin kiran taro. Kamar yadda FOIA'd imel da kuma saƙonnin Slack masu alaƙa bayyana karara, “Kirista” da “Ron” ne suka jagoranci tuhumar. Za su ci gaba da matsin lamba a cikin musayar imel na gaba, a ƙarshe samun Andersen da takwarorinsa na Anglosphere su sake yin watsi da ka'idar tasu ta asali kuma su amince da ainihin ka'idar akasin haka, watau, asalin zoonotic na SARS-CoV-2, a cikin takarda mai suna "Proximal Origin". (Duba, alal misali, imel ɗin 'mai bayyana sirri' wanda ba a san shi ba ga Jon Cohen na Science buga mujallar nan. Kwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwayoyin cuta guda biyu waɗanda ba shakka Drosten da Fouchier ne.)
Yanzu, idan kun kasance jami'in bincike da ke binciken wani laifi - alal misali, ƙirƙirar ƙwayar cuta da ake tsammani (ko a zahiri tana da kisa, ba shakka, wani al'amari ne) - halin wa za ku iya samun shakku? Halin waɗanda da kansu suka nuna damuwa game da leb ɗin lab kuma suna da sha'awar bincikar lamarin - ciki har da, ba bene, Ba kowa ba face Anthony Fauci, wanda har ma ya ba da shawarar tuntuɓar FBI! - ko kuma halin waɗanda suka yi watsi da tsaro da kuma ƙoƙarin rufe tattaunawar?
"Shin ba mu taru don kalubalantar wata ka'ida ba kuma, idan za mu iya, mu watsar da ita?" Christian Drosten ya tambaya da ban haushi a cikin imel ɗin 9 ga Fabrairu, 2020 zuwa ga sauran membobin ƙungiyar: "Wane ne ya fara wannan labarin a farkon? Shin muna aiki don karya ka'idar makircin mu?"
Shin waɗannan suna kama da maganar wani marar laifi? Ba da yawa ba, musamman idan muka yi la'akari da cewa kafin wannan imel ɗin ya fito godiya ga buƙatar FOIA ta Amurka, Drosten ya nace sanarwar rantsuwa ga wata kotun Jamus "Ba shi da sha'awar gudanar da zato game da asalin kwayar cutar ta SARS-CoV-2 ta wata hanya. Musamman, Ina da kuma ba ni da wata sha'awa ta musamman don kawar da abin da ake kira binciken dakin gwaje-gwaje." Babu sha'awar tuƙi da zato a wata hanya?! Ta yaya hakan ya yi daidai da “Shin ba mu taru don ƙalubalantar wata ka’ida ba, kuma idan za mu iya, mu ƙyale ta”?
Drosten, kamar yadda aka tattauna a cikin 'Me yasa Fauci, ba Drosten ba?', yana da alaƙa da dakin gwaje-gwaje na Jamusanci da Sinawa a Wuhan da Babban Daraktanta na Jamus Ulf Dittmer. Kamar yadda aka gani a hoton da ke ƙasa, taron 2015 da gwamnatin Jamus da gwamnatin Jamus suka shirya a Berlin ya haɗa ba kawai Drosten da kwararre kan cutar korona ba Shi Zhengli na Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan, har ma da Jamusanci da shugabannin Sinawa na dakin gwaje-gwaje na Jamus da Sinawa, Ulf Dittmer da Dongliang Yang na WI, da darektan WI na yanzu!
Darakta a lokacin, Chen Xinwen, shi ne dan karamin mutum mai hakora mai dokin shudi a wannan hoton. Matashiyar mai dogon gashi mai baƙar fata a ƙasan kusurwar hannun hagu da alama ita ce daraktan WIV na yanzu Wang Yanyi, kodayake ba a saka Wang a matsayin mai shiga cikin shirin ba.
a) Wang Yanyi? b) Shi Zhengli c) Christian Drosten d) Ulf Dittmer e) Dongliang Yang f) Chen Xinwen
A cikin Janairu 2020, haka kuma, Drosten ya ce Jamus kullum Jaridar Berliner Zeitung cewa ya koya game da kwayar cutar da ake zaton labari ce a Wuhan daga abokan aikin likitan dabbobi a cikin garin kafin ma a ba da rahoton kamuwa da cuta a hukumance!
Idan kwayar cutar da aka kirkira a Montana ya kamata ta ko ta yaya ta shiga Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan, duk da cewa WIV ba ta ma zama wani bangare na aikin CREID da Amurka ke bayarwa ba wanda ake zargin ya yi alaka, me ya sa ba za ta iya zuwa dakin gwaje-gwajen kwayar cutar kwayar cutar ta Jamus da China a daya bangaren Yangtze ba? (Bugu da ƙari, aikin CREID - wanda a zahiri ya fi hanyar sadarwa fiye da aiki - ba a ƙaddamar da shi ba har sai 2020: watanni da yawa. bayan farkon barkewar cutar Covid-19 a Wuhan.)
Kamar yadda taswirar ƙasa daga Science mujallar ya bayyana karara, harabar Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan a zahiri ba ta kusa da yankin farkon rukunin cututtukan Covid-19 a Wuhan. Lab ɗin Jamusanci-China, da bambanci, yana daidai a cikin gungu. Yana a asibitin Union, wanda aka keɓe ta lamba 6 a cikin taswira. Jami'ar kasar Sin mai daukar nauyin dakin gwaje-gwaje, Kwalejin Kiwon Lafiyar Jama'a ta Tongji, tana kusan cibiyar barkewar annobar: kusan kilomita daya zuwa arewacin asibitin Tongji, wanda aka zayyana ta lamba 5 a taswirar.
Haka kuma, barin barin duk wani bincike da ake yi a Montana ko, a ce, Chapel Hill, menene muka sani game da binciken da ake gudanarwa a dakin gwaje-gwajen kwayar cutar kwayar cuta ta Jamus da China a Wuhan kanta? Ba yawa.
A cikin Satumba 2021, wani Reinhard G. ya yi amfani da gidan yanar gizon da aka sadaukar don gabatar da tambayoyi ga 'yan majalisar Jamus domin tambaya dan majalisar dokokin tarayyar Jamus Christian Ehler ko ana gudanar da bincike na fa'ida a dakin gwaje-gwaje na Jamus da China. Ehler ita ce shugabar kwamitin majalisar EU kan makomar kimiyya da fasaha (STOA). Reinhard G. bai sami amsa ba. Tawagar Ehler sun lura cewa ba su sani ba.
Amma me yasa ba 'yan jarida ko masu sharhi na Jamus ba, waɗanda da yawa daga cikinsu sun nuna sha'awar DEFUSE da CREID, suna buƙatar sani? Ba a ba da kuɗin kuɗi na DEFUSE ba. Gwamnatin Amurka ce ke ba da tallafin cibiyar sadarwar CREID, amma Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan ba ta cikin ta kuma ta fara aiki sosai bayan barkewar cutar Covid-19 a Wuhan. An kaddamar da dakin gwaje-gwaje na Jamus-China a cikin 2017 kuma gwamnatin Jamus ce ke daukar nauyinsa. Ya girma daga aikin haɗin gwiwar Jamus da Sinawa, TRR60, wanda aka ba da kuɗin jama'a na tsawon shekaru goma daga 2009 zuwa 2018 wanda, kamar yadda na nuna. nan, da alfahari ya nuna Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan a matsayin abokin tarayya.
Me ya sa duniya ba za ta san da yawa game da Jamusanci-China Lab da TRR60 kamar yadda ta san game da DEFUSE da CREID? Ina buƙatun 'Yancin Bayani? Me yasa gwamnatin Jamus ke kare su? Idan wani ya tambaya, aƙalla zai iya cewa a’a, wanda hakan zai bayyana a kansa.
Mun san cewa Gwamnatin Jamus ta ba da kuɗin gwajin-na-aiki, domin ba wanin Kirista Drosten ya kasance mai gudanar da wani bangare da yawa da ke tallafawa jama'a. Aikin RAPID wanda ya hada da su, kamar yadda ake iya gani a kasa. Stefan Pöhlmann ya kasance, ba zato ba tsammani, Daraktan daya daga cikin RAPID ƙananan ayyuka.
Tabbas, idan mutum yana da bayanan Amurka kawai, zai ƙare ya ba da labarin Amurka. Amma idan da gaske wani ikon kasashen waje yana da hannu wajen tserewa ko sakin kwayar cutar injiniya a Wuhan, to prima facie Jamus ce aka fi fuskantar tuhuma.
An sake buga shi daga Jaridar Daily Skeptic
-
Robert Kogon shi ne sunan alkalami na wani ɗan jarida da ake bugawa da yawa wanda ke yin rubuce-rubuce kan al'amuran Turai.
Duba dukkan posts
