Kotuna ba kasafai suke fitar da hukunce-hukunce a ranakun hutu na tarayya ba, amma babu shakka za a fitar da batun game da muhimmancin wannan shari’ar ga ‘yancinmu da tsarin mulki ya ba mu, Alkali Terry Doughty ya saki a Ranar ‘Yancin Kai mai shafi 155. hukuncin a kan bukatar mu na neman matakin farko kan tsarin tauhidi na gwamnati.
Gabaɗayan takardar ya cancanci karantawa ga waɗanda ke son tona cikakkun bayanai, amma a takaice, ya ba da kusan dukkanin tanade-tanaden da ke cikin buƙatarmu, tare da sanya ƙayyadaddun iyaka ga duk wata hanyar sadarwa tsakanin jami’an gwamnati da kamfanonin kafofin watsa labarun. Idan irin wannan sadarwar ta ci gaba, za a shigar da karar a cikin shari'armu kuma za ta iya shigar da 'yan wasan cikin laifin aikata laifuka don karya umarnin.
A zahiri mutum yana so ya yarda cewa batun da mutum ya shiga yana da mahimmancin tarihin duniya. Amma kamar yadda alkalin da kansa ya rubuta a hukuncin, “Idan zargin da masu gabatar da kara suka yi gaskiya ne. lamarin da ake iya cewa yanzu ya kunshi mafi girman hari kan 'yancin fadin albarkacin baki a tarihin Amurka.” Wannan, abokaina, da'awa ce mai ƙarfi, amma kamar yadda nake da ita a baya jayayya, daidai ne gaba ɗaya.
A matsayin tsohon babban lauyan Missouri, yanzu Sanata Eric Schmitt, ya gaya Dan jarida Michael Shellenberger, "Abin mamaki ne, matakin daidaitawa tsakanin manyan jami'an gwamnati da manyan jami'an kafofin watsa labarun yana da ban mamaki, akwai sakonnin rubutu kai tsaye daga babban likitan likitancin Amurka zuwa manyan jami'an Facebook yana cewa, 'Ku sauke wannan.' Ba Ba-Amurke ne kawai."
A cewar Shellenberger, Schmitt ya yi kira ga daraktan hukumar tsaro ta yanar gizo da samar da ababen more rayuwa ta ma’aikatar tsaron cikin gida (CISA), Jennifer Easterly, da ta yi murabus. Ya kuma yi imanin cewa, ya kamata Majalisar Dokokin Amurka ta ba da umarni ga kamfanonin Big Tech su tabbatar da gaskiya. "Ya kamata Jennifer Easterly ya yi murabus," in ji shi, "babu shakka game da hakan." Kuma ina ganin cewa mutanen da ke shiga cikin wannan a yanzu, wadanda ke da hannu a ciki, ya kamata a fallasa su, kuma ya kamata a sami sakamako."
Saboda matsin lokaci a yau tare da tambayoyin kafofin watsa labaru game da wannan labarai, a nan zan yi magana mai tsawo Shellenberger's Rahoton daga yau yana ambato ni - malalaci da irin abin ban mamaki, na sani:
Kafin Alkali Doughty ya yanke hukuncin, mun kuma tattauna da Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, mai shigar da kara a shari’ar. Kheriaty shi ne tsohon darektan kula da da'a na likitanci a Jami'ar California Irvine amma an kore shi bayan ya kalubalanci umarnin jami'ar a gaban kotu. "Za ku koyi su waye abokanku na gaske lokacin da kuka fuskanci wani abu makamancin haka," in ji shi. "Duk abin da ya faru ya kasance mai aminci."
Bayan daukar matakin kasa da kasa kan umarnin rigakafin, Kheriaty ya rubuta littafi, The Sabuwar Rashin Al'ada: Haɓakar Jihar Tsaro ta Kwayoyin cuta. Ta hanyar binciken da ya yi na littafin, aikin tantancewar da gwamnati ke yi ya bayyana a gare shi. "Wani ɓangare na abin da ya sa duk munanan manufofin zai yiwu shi ne tsauraran matakan sarrafa bayanai," in ji Kheriaty.
Bayanan da shi da masu shigar da kara suka gano ta hanyar karar da suka yi ya ba su mamaki, kamar yadda ya shaida mana.
"Ba mu san abin da za mu samu ba idan muka juya wannan dutsen," in ji Kheriaty. "Kuma ya zama cewa yin katsalandan yana faruwa ba bisa ga umarnin hukumomin kiwon lafiyar jama'a ba, kamar CDC da NIH, amma hukumomin leken asirin sun shiga ciki - Ma'aikatar Shari'a, FBI, Ma'aikatar Jiha, Ma'aikatar Tsaro ta Cikin Gida.
A cikin labarinsa na kwanan nan a cikin Tablet, Kheriaty ya kira shirin gwamnati da "Tace Lewiathan.” Da yake kwatanta wannan leviathan a matsayin wani ɓangare na tsarin mulkin kama karya, Kheriaty ya nuna aikin masanin falsafar siyasar Jamus-Amurka Eric Voegelin "[Voegelin] ya ce fasalin gama gari na dukkanin tsarin mulkin kama-da-wane ... shine haramcin tambayoyi," in ji Kheriaty.
Mun tambayi Kheriaty game da martanin da ya yi game da umarnin, wanda shine muhimmin mataki a kan hanyar zuwa Kotun Koli. "Na san a cikin ƙasusuwana za mu ci nasara a wannan: shaidar da ke cikin yardarmu tana da yawa," in ji shi. "Hukuncin jiya ya nuna mafarin kawo karshen cece-kucen leviathan."
Kheriaty ta ce, "Tsarin tsarin mulkin Amurka wani abu ne na al'ajabi. Amma sai dai idan ba mu kare shi ba, takarda ce kawai."
Na kuma yi magana da safiyar yau da ɗan jarida Matt Taibbi, kuma zan faɗi karimci daga kyakkyawan sa rahoton yau a kan umarnin (bayanin kula: Shellenberger's da kuma TaibbiSubstacks sun cancanci biyan kuɗi idan kuna son ƙarin ɗaukar hoto game da batun ba da izini-dukansu suna cikin 'yan jarida na farko da suka karya labaran Fayilolin Twitter kuma suna bin shari'ar mu sosai):
Da wannan hukunci a cikin Missouri da Biden shari'ar censorship, Doughty ya fita hanyarsa a ranar hudu ga Yuli, don fitar da wani tsantsar tsawatarwa a wani layin jami'an gwamnati, da yawa daga cikinsu masu hali ne a cikin Fayilolin Twitter. Raket masu karatu za su gane sunaye kamar Elvis Chan da Laura Dehmlow (na FBI), Jen Easterly da Brian Scully (na Ma'aikatar Tsaron Cikin Gida), Laura Rosenberger (Mataimaki na Musamman ga Shugaban Kasa, kuma daya daga cikin wadanda suka kirkiro Hamilton 68) da Daniel Kimmage (na Cibiyar Harkokin Duniya), waɗanda aka ba da umarnin kawai su sami jahannama daga Dokar Farko. Fassarar Magana, Doughty ya umarce su daga:
ganawa da kamfanonin sadarwar zamantakewa don matsawa ko jawo ta kowace hanya kawar ko murkushe 'yancin fadin albarkacin baki;
- nuna alama a kan dandamali na kafofin watsa labarun da / ko aikawa zuwa kamfanonin kafofin watsa labarun suna kira iri ɗaya;
- haɗin gwiwa tare da Haɗin gwiwar Mutunci na Zaɓe, Ayyukan Virality, Stanford Internet Observatory, ko kowane "kamar aiki" ko rukuni don manufa ɗaya;
- barazana ko tilastawa kamfanonin kafofin watsa labarun cire kariya ta 'yancin fadin albarkacin baki.
Kafofin yada labarai na gado, wadanda suka yi watsi da wannan lamarin, sun kasa yin watsi da hukuncin na jiya, don haka akwai rahotanni a cikin rahoton. New York Times, da Washington Post, da Wall Street Journal, Reuters, da sauransu. The Times da Post cike da takaici yayi kokarin tsara lamarin a matsayin batun bangaranci. Amma ba shakka, ba batu ne na hagu/dama ko na sassaucin ra'ayi ba kwata-kwata: batu ne na shari'a/ba bisa ka'ida ba. Tambaya ɗaya ita ce ko jami'an gwamnati sun yi ko kuma ba su keta babbar doka ta ƙasar ba—wato Kundin Tsarin Mulki na Amurka. A jiya, kotun ta nuna cewa amsar wannan tambaya na iya zama eh, tabbas ayyukan gwamnati sun sabawa kundin tsarin mulkin kasar, kuma mai yiwuwa ne masu shigar da kara su yi nasara kan abin da ya dace.
The New York Times labarai har ma sun murɗe hannayensu suna damuwa cewa hukuncin zai iya “takaita ƙoƙarce-ƙoƙarce don yaƙar ɓata bayanai”—suna tambayar wanene ya yanke shawarar abin da ya ƙunshi ɓatanci. Kwaskwarimar Farko ta nuna a fili wannan ba zai zama aikin gwamnati ba. Fiye da magana, da Times da Post A cikin tsarin da suka yi na shari’ar sai kawai suka ce bangaren shiru da babbar murya, wanda ke nuni da cewa wadannan jaridun sun yi imanin cewa tauye hakkin gwamnati na da kyau matukar dai ta kula da kwararar bayanai ta hanyoyin da suka amince.
Taibbi ya ci gaba da yin tsokaci:
Hukuncin jiya, wanda a zahiri za a yi watsi da shi a matsayin 'yan Republican clickbait, ya nuna aƙalla alkali ɗaya na tarayya ya yarda da hujjar cewa wani hadadden tsarin don tattara shawarwarin abun ciki daga hukumomin tilastawa da 'yan siyasa zuwa dandamali na fasaha yana wakiltar abin da Babban Lauyan ya kira "Kamfanin Cin Hanci da Rashawa na tarayya." A matsayin daya daga cikin masu gabatar da kara, Dr. Aaron Kheriaty rubuta, Shaidun da ke cikin karar sun bayyana batutuwan da gwamnati ke sa ido sosai fiye da yadda yawancin mutane suka sani a yanzu, tun daga akidar jinsi zuwa zubar da ciki zuwa manufofin kudi zuwa yakin Ukraine da kuma bayan haka.
Kheriaty ya ce, "Ku ɗauki duk wani lamari mai cike da ruɗani a rayuwar jama'ar Amurka," in ji Kheriaty a yau, "kuma da alama gwamnatin tarayya, da zarar sun sami wannan injin ɗin, sai kawai suka yi tunanin, 'Lafiya, za mu iya magance' rashin fahimta' akan kowane nau'in abubuwa."
The Missouri da Biden Masu binciken sun gano irin yanayin gaskiyar da aka samu ta hanyar Twitter Files 'yan jarida kamar ni, Michael Shellenberger, Bari Weiss, Lee Fang, David Zweig, da Paul Thacker, sannan daga baya. Andrew Lowenthal, Aaron Mate, Sue Schmidt, Matt Orfalea, Tom Wyatt, Matt Farwell, @Techno_Fog, da sauran su sun yi.. Sun kuma maimaita bayanin ta kamar haka Yakubu Siegel at Tablet, ko Robby Soave a Dalili, wanda yayi rubutu akan batutuwa makamantan haka a Facebook.
Mu da muka yi aiki a kan labarin Fayilolin Twitter sun fara fuskantar matsala iri ɗaya masu bincike da masu ƙara a cikin Missouri da Biden A bayyane ya yi, rashin sanin abin da za a yi na yawan hukumomi da kamfanonin da ke cikin abin da ke kama da tsare-tsare na tantancewa. Na san ba ni kaɗai ba ne a cikin masu ba da rahoto na Fayil na Twitter a cikin damuwa don ba da rahoton cewa "buƙatun" suna zuwa daga "hukumomi a fadin gwamnatin tarayya - daga Ma'aikatar Harkokin Wajen zuwa Pentagon zuwa CIA.” Abin da muke gani ke nan, amma kamar yadda lokaci ya yi, har ma da maudu’ai da ma’aikatun gwamnati, da kungiyoyin da ke da alaka da gwamnati suka fara bullowa, abin da muke kallo kadan ne.
A ƙarshe, mun sami wannan makircin da aka zayyana a ciki Missouri da Biden: matsin lamba daga gwamnati ta hanyar ƙa'idar barazanar, sannan kuma ɗimbin shawarwari game da abubuwan da ke cikin hukumomi da yawa (masu bincike a cikin wannan karar har ma sun sami shiga tsakani daga Ofishin ƙidayar jama'a). Wannan ya faru ne ta hanyar gina wasu ma'aikatu masu zaman kansu waɗanda a wasu lokuta da alama an yi su ne a matsayin hanyar da gwamnati za ta yi haɗin gwiwa a kan daidaita abubuwan da ke ciki ba tare da keta doka ta farko kai tsaye ba.
Yawancinmu da ke rufe Fayilolin Twitter sun yi ƙoƙarin guje wa shiga cikin tambayar tsarin mulki / doka, amma ba mu iya yin mamaki a wasu lokuta, misali tare da Stanford's Election Integrity Partnership and Virality Project, wanda ya haifar da tsarin tikitin abun ciki na dandamali game da tseren 2020 da Covid-19. Dukkanmu mun yi tunanin muna kallon wata babbar matsala a can, tun da shugabannin makarantu daga wurare kamar Stanford ba su ji kunyar cewa suna son "cike gibin abubuwan da gwamnati ba za ta iya yi da kanta ba"saboda abokan tarayya kamar DHS/CISA sun rasa"kudade da izini na doka"don yin aikin.
Menene zai iya faruwa idan an gabatar da alkalai ko juritoci tare da wannan hoton duka, gami da cikakkun bayanai game da buɗe, ci gaba da haɗin gwiwar waɗannan ƙungiyoyi tare da hukumomin gwamnati kamar CISA da Babban Likita? Muna da ra'ayi yanzu.
Korar wadannan korafe-korafen a matsayin wani bangare na "tinfoil hat" da 'yan siyasa suka kulla yayi min tambayoyi da Michael Shellenberger a Majalisa, da kuma ta takardu irin su New York Times da kuma Washington Post, a duk tsawon lokaci ana jin irin wannan kuskuren da ya haifar da mummunar kiraye-kirayen zaben 2016 da kuma hasarar dimbin masu sauraren kafafen yada labarai na gargajiya a shekarun da suka biyo baya.
Wadannan masu sa ido kan labarai na yau da kullun sun makale a cikin kumfa na yin nasu kuma ba za su iya ko ba za su ga cewa matsakaicin Amurkawa yana kallon wasiƙun Fadar White House don rufe asusun kafofin watsa labarun, ko tarin “shawarwari” kan abun ciki daga FBI, kuma suna jin da gaske cewa shi ko ita ba sa son hakan, duk abin da yake. Mutum na iya fatan aƙalla ƴan masu fafutuka za su karanta hukuncin kuma su fahimci cewa a cikin dimokuradiyya, ba za ku iya samun yanayin da rabin (ko ƙasa da haka) na yawan jama'a ke tunanin wani abu mai mahimmanci kamar yadda yanayin magana ya shirya daidai. Wannan kawai ba zai riƙe ba, yin hukunce-hukunce irin wannan abin da ake iya gani, idan ba makawa ba. Komai menene, wannan ba zai iya zama wani abu ba sai labari mai daɗi ga Gyaran Farko.
"Da fatan," in ji Kheriaty, "jiya ita ce farkon ƙarshen satar bayanan Leviathan."
Zan yi posting ƙarin sharhi a kan hukuncin da matakai na gaba a cikin lamarin a cikin kwanaki masu zuwa. Jiya ita ce nasara ta farko a hanya mai tsawo da tafiyar hawainiya zuwa Kotun Koli, inda masu lura da al'amura ke ganin za a yanke hukunci a karshe. A yanzu, zan bar muku wasu ƴan layukan da za su yi tunani daga shafukan rufe shawarar jiya (shafi na 154):
Duk da cewa har yanzu wannan shari’a tana da karancin shekaru, kuma a halin yanzu kotun tana yin nazari ne kawai a kan yiwuwar samun nasara a kan masu shigar da kara. Shaidar da aka samar har yanzu tana kwatanta yanayin yanayin dystopian. A lokacin cutar ta COVID-19, wani lokaci mai yiwuwa mafi kyawun yanayin shakku da rashin tabbas, Gwamnatin Amurka da alama ta ɗauki wani matsayi irin na Orwellian "Ma'aikatar Gaskiya."
Masu shigar da kara sun gabatar da kwararan shaidu da ke nuna goyon bayansu na cewa su ne wadanda aka kashe a wani kamfen mai nisa da yaduwa. Wannan kotu ta gano cewa akwai yuwuwar su yi nasara bisa cancantar da'awarsu ta 'yancin faɗar albarkacin bakinsu ta Farko a kan waɗanda ake tuhuma.
Na amince cewa, a ƙarshe, za mu yi nasara.
Sake bugawa daga marubucin Mayarwa
-
Aaron Kheriaty, Babban mashawarcin Cibiyar Brownstone, masani ne a Cibiyar Da'a da Harkokin Jama'a, DC. Shi tsohon farfesa ne na ilimin hauka a Jami'ar California a Makarantar Magunguna ta Irvine, inda ya kasance darektan da'a na likitanci.
Duba dukkan posts
