Bayan da FDA ta daidaita karar da aka shigar da ita saboda rashin son rai da lalata ivermectin, hukumar ta share jerin labaran da aka yi ta intanet. Hakan yana da kyau, amma bai kamata mu manta da yadda ya ɓata magungunan miyagun ƙwayoyi ba, ya yi watsi da ɗimbin shaidun da ya dace da shi, kuma ya bayyana masu goyon bayansa a matsayin tukwane masu haɗari.
Kimanin watanni 30 da suka gabata, FDA ta Amurka tana buga labarai tare da kanun labarai kamar haka: "Shin zan dauki ivermectin don maganin COVID?" Amsa: A'a.
Hukumar ta kuma fadawa Amurkawa ba don amfani ba ivermectin don rigakafin Covid.
Sa'an nan kuma, a cikin abin da ya zama sananne a matsayin maras kyau "doki tweet"FDA har ma ta gaya wa Amurkawa: "Da gaske, ku duka. dakatar da shi."
Masu rubutawa waɗanda suka ba da shawarar wasu hanyoyin jiyya da suka haɗa da ivermectin ko hydroxychloroquine sun kasance. mãsu, izgili a kan layi ta "'yan jaridan Amurka masu amincewa" a matsayin wani ɓangare na "maƙarƙashiyar dama" da kuma lakabin "masu hazaka.” Wadanda ba su yi la'akari da Covid mRNA ko wasu labarun jiyya na Covid Big Pharma ba an dakatar da su, kora, kuma sun yi magana da kakkausar murya game da duniya da kuma isar da saƙon a cikin abin da ya zama kamar saƙon haɗin gwiwa.
Yawancin likitocin da suka gaskanta in ba haka ba sun rasa nasu jobs- mafi kyau. Sun yi hasarar sunansu, ayyukansu, kuɗin kuɗi, sun wargaza sana'ar da suka samu.
Kamar dai hakan bai yi kyau ba, ko da sun rasa ayyukansu, jihar likita da kuma allunan kantin magani Har ila yau, ƙaddamar da tropes ba daidai ba, ƙaddamar da shari'ar shari'a game da lasisin su, tare da fitar da "lakabin-lakabin" maganin Covid-duk da sauran jiyya da ba su da alamar sun kasance wani ɓangare na duk kantin magani da ayyukan likita.
A cikin kwanaki na farkon rubuce-rubucen FDA a sama, da Ƙungiyar Magunguna ta Amurka (APhA) da Jama'ar Amirka na Tsarin Kiwon Lafiyar Magunguna (ASHP), da Ƙungiyar Ƙwararrun Amurka (AMA) duk sun hada kai don sakin a hadin gwiwar manema labarai la'antar likitoci wanda ya wajabta ivermectin don kula da Covid, amma ya bayyana cewa waɗannan ƙungiyoyin - maimakon a zahiri yin bincike mai zaman kansa na bayanan da ake samu - FDA, CDC, NIH, da sauran gwamnati Big Pharma maki magana"mai tsananin adawa"Ivermectin amfani.
Ga tsararraki ƙwararrun ƙwararrun sun dogara da waɗannan ƙungiyoyin kiwon lafiya na “fitattu”. Wasu daga cikinsu sun wanzu kusan shekaru 170 kuma suna da ko'ina daga dala miliyan 150 zuwa dala biliyan 1.2 a cikin kadarori, don haka a fili suna da tarihi, ƙwararrun ma'aikatan, manufa da abin da ya dace don bincika bayanan da aka buga da gaske. Ko da bayan waɗannan, AMA yana da benaye da yawa a cikin wani kaddara a Chicago cike da masana. The APHA's constitution Avenue'shedkwatar alama” yana da dadi sosai har ya kasance talla da kuma amfani da matsayin wurin bikin aure.
Tabbas, miliyoyin masana harhada magunguna, likitoci, da membobin agaji sun biya wannan almubazzaranci a tsawon ƙarni waɗanda suka yi tsammanin waɗannan ƙungiyoyin za su yi aiki a matsayin ingantacciyar ƙididdiga da tabbatar da kyawawan ƙa'idodin aikin asibiti - ba kawai a makance aku maganganun wasu ba.
Ya kamata waɗannan ƙungiyoyin likitanci su mutunta tarihinsu, alhakinsu, da ƙa'idodin kiwon lafiya don inganta yanayin ɗan adam ta amfani da shaidar asibiti/kimiya. Maimakon haka, sun bayyana sun yi watsi da wajibcinsu da ban tsoro daga matsayi masu girma na girmamawa, ta'aziyya, kuɗi, da kuma iko.
APhA, ASHP, da AMA Shawarwari na asibiti Dukansu sun kasance kuma ba su da kariya:
A ranar 22 ga Maris, FDA ta amince da hakan cire anti-ivermectin posting saboda 1) karar da aka shigar a kansu da 2) Aikin da ba zai yuwu ba na samun kare kansu da ɗimbin bayanan da ba su yarda da ba kawai ba da shawarwarin likita ba, amma bayanan da aka buga suna goyan bayan amfani da Covid-19 (misali, duba ƙasa).
Tare da shafukan yanar gizo na FDA sun tafi, maganganun AphA, ASHP, da AMA waɗanda koyaushe suna sirara, ba zato ba tsammani ba su da ƙafar da za su tsaya.
Yawancin hanyoyin haɗin gwiwar da ba na FDA ba a cikin fitattun jaridun su (ba abin mamaki ba) suma sun ɓace a hankali ba tare da wani bayani ba. Bayanan NIH sune an shirya za a rufe, a saman mahara FDA da kuma CDC hanyoyin haɗin gwiwa sun riga sun daina aiki. (lura da adiresoshin html a cikin hanyoyin haɗin da ba sa aiki)
Tsarin Aiki da Shaida na Tarihi Ivermectin:
Babban tsarin rigakafin cutar ivermectin yana da rikitarwa kuma yana iya haɗawa da wani ɓangare na toshe ƙwayoyin sunadaran ƙwayoyin cuta, amma layin ƙasa shine an nuna shi yana ba da sakamako mai kyau a cikin sakamako da yawa da aka buga don Covid-19.
Ya kasance da APhA, ASHP, da AMA masu harhada magunguna (watau #Masana Magunguna) da/ko likitocin AMA da kansa yayi nazarin bayanan, (kamar yadda ni, mai sharhi kan lafiyar miyagun ƙwayoyi ɗaya kawai ya yi ba tare da kyauta na miliyoyin daloli ba, hedkwatar zato) maimakon kawai sake maimaita labarun wasu, da sun koyi cewa ivermectin ayyukansu a matsayin antiviral.
Hoton hoto na Twitter: Shafin Gida na ASHP na Twitter ya gaya wa duniya cewa su "#Masana Likita ne"
Ivermectin yana da cikakken tarihin kasancewa ba kawai lafiya ba - amma abin mamaki yana da lafiya ga cututtuka iri-iri. A hankali; wannan ba karya ba ne ko ƙwaƙƙwaran kimiyya; yana da kasance rubuta game da na shekaru da. Ivermectin wani magani ne mai aminci kuma mai inganci wanda baya cikin 2015 shine magani na farko don kamuwa da cuta mai alaƙa da Nobel Prize a cikin shekaru 60.
Yayin da nake da tarin fayiloli na lantarki da kayan bugu, kunnen kare da abinci/abin sha, akwai mafi kyawun gabatarwa meta-bincike gidan yanar gizon da wasu masu hankali da masana kimiyyar yanar gizo suka tsara ke ba da cikakken bayani Sama da bincike 100 daga masana kimiyya daban-daban sama da 1,000, wadanda suka shafi marasa lafiya sama da 140,000 a cikin kasashe 29 suna bayyana fa'ida da amincin ivermectin don maganin Covid-19.
A gaskiya ma, a zahiri ya bayyana ya fi girma fiye da Tsohon bita na Cochrane na ivermectin wanda yayi nazarin gwaje-gwaje 14 kawai - wanda a asirce ya cire bakwai daga la'akari.
Dangane da waɗannan bayanan, wanda ya ƙunshi ƙananan wallafe-wallafen ƙasashen duniya waɗanda suka haɗa da binciken ainihin duniya da ƙananan binciken bincike, ivermectin yana nuna ƙarancin haɗarin Covid-19 kamar yadda cikakken bayani a cikin taƙaitaccen hoto na sama.
Duk abubuwan da aka gano sun fi son amfani da Ivermectin, wasu fiye da sauran. Abubuwan da ba su da inganci da ke da alaƙa da jiyya ta ƙarshe/karewar kwayar cutar hoto ko ƙungiyar bayanan asibiti an haɗa su da jinkirin gudanarwa. Da yawa kamar ƙarshen matakin magani na wasu yanayi kamar ciwon daji, duk wani amfani da ƙarshen-jihar na maganin ƙwayar cuta yakan yi rashin tasiri bayan ɗaruruwan miliyoyin ƙwayoyin cuta sun faru. Haka lamarin yake ga kowane kamuwa da cuta, ko ciwon sanyi ne, mura, AIDS, ko Covid-19.
Sabanin Bayanan Nazari da Yake da shi da Ka'idodin Ayyukan Asibiti:
ASHP, AphA da AMA ba su sake nazarin bayanan da ke akwai ba kuma ga hujjar. Lokacin da FDA ta tsawatar da Amurkawa ba Yi amfani da ivermectin don Covid-19 a ranar 25 ga Afrilu, 2021, akwai 43 rubuce-rubuce daban-daban da aka buga suna nuna fa'idarsa.
Kusan watanni uku bayan haka, a ranar 21 ga Agusta, FDA ta fito da rashin lafiyarta doki / saniya tweet wanda ke nuna cewa ivermectin na dabbobi ne kawai, ba mutane ba. FDA ta Agusta 21st "ninki biyu" ya faru a matsayin ƙarin karatun 20 daga baya an rubuta bayanan ƙarin fa'idodi ga Covid-19. Duba jadawalin lokaci a ƙasa:
A cikin hoton da aka nuna a sama, da'irar BLUE da aka nuna sune nazarce-nazarce waɗanda ke dalla-dalla ingantaccen binciken binciken ivermectin da da'irar RED mara kyau. Akwai bayanan da ba su da kyau, amma tabbataccen binciken ivermectin ya fi su duka a cikin binciken yawa da karatu size (wanda aka kwatanta da girman da'irar), bisa ga bayanan bincike na meta da aka buga a: c19ivm.org.
Maganganun APHA/ASHP/AMA da yawa a cikin sanarwar manema labarai sun yi watsi da bayanan kimiyya da na asibiti da aka buga. Musamman, maganganun da ke bayyana: "An nuna amfani da ivermectin don rigakafi da magani na COVID-19 yana da illa ga marasa lafiya” (nasu mai ƙarfi) su ne gaskiya ba daidai ba. Ban san kan me aka yi wadannan kalamai ba.
Ƙarin shawarwarin su ga ƙwararrun kiwon lafiya zuwa "… nasiha ga marasa lafiya game da amfani da ivermectin a matsayin magani ga COVID-19, gami da jaddada illolin da wannan magani ke da shi. yana wakiltar tashi daga ka'idojin aikin likitan magunguna da likitoci.
Rashin hankali na wannan magana ya wuce gona da iri. Pharmacists da likitoci sun san cewa duk kwayoyi suna da "...yiwuwar illa mai guba"don haka idan sun yi amfani da ma'auni na"nanata illolin masu guba mai yuwuwa” yayin tattaunawa kowane magungunan da aka rubuta, kaɗan (idan akwai) marasa lafiya za su abada shan magungunan su. Ƙiyayya ta APhA/ASHP/AMA ga ivermectin ba ta asibiti kaɗai ba ce rashin adalci da rashin alhaki; ya kasance - gwargwadon yadda na sani - ba tare da wani misali ba.
Waɗannan wuraren magana na anti-ivermectin kuma sun amfana da sabon ci gaban samfur na Big Pharma ciki har da sake dawowa, sama da farashin mai-kudin kuɗin haraji na Paxlovid da Remdesivir, irin wannan "lafiya kuma mai tasiri" magani wanda dole ne asibitoci su kasance arfafa sosai (watau, cin hanci) don jawo hankalin ma'aikatan jinya, likitoci, da masu kula da asibitoci don inganta amfani da shi a matsayin "ka'idar asibiti" ta hanyar da ba a taɓa ji ba. 20% "bonus" akan duk lissafin asibitin, masu biyan haraji ne suka biya. Wannan duk da cewa Maimaitawa ya riga ya sami sardonic, sunan barkwanci na "gudu-mutu-na-kusa" ta Ma'aikatan Farko na Amurka da sauransu, saboda tsanani tambayoyi game da amfaninsa na asibiti.
Me ya sa ba a sami goyan bayan maganganun hukumomin tarayya da ƙungiyoyin ƙwararru game da ivermectin da masu zaman kansu, ainihin jarrabawar bayanan AphA/ASHP/AMA? Wannan tambayar tana bukatar zama sosai bincike game da yiwuwar kama tsari da/ko Babban Pharma rikice-rikice a cikin sahu.
Duka lokacin da kuma yanzu, waɗancan shafukan yanar gizon FDA, rubuce-rubuce, da tweets ba kawai son zuciya ba ne kuma a zahiri ba daidai ba ne. Sun kasance marasa alhaki a asibiti wajen cin mutuncin ivermectin a matsayin maganin kashe-kashe
Tambaya mai mahimmanci da za a yi la'akari da ita ita ce, wanene ya fi muni? FDA don wuce gona da iri kan ikon majalisar A cikin ba kawai yin shawarwarin likita, amma bada shawarwari watsi da bayanai, ko kuma "mai aiki" masu zaman kanta "Elite Elite kungiyoyin sana'a masu zaman kansu kuma suna makanta wa labari? Shin dalilinsu na kudi ne? Siyasa ne?
Prescient ko a'a, ga wani yanki na kwamitin kwararru shedar majalisa ga Kwamitin Sa ido na Gida na Covid Select, yana bayanin ivermectin na FDA na ɓatanci da haɓaka alluran mRNA ta amfani da kwatankwacin mota, an ba da shi kawai. wata rana kafin amincewar FDA ga ƙarar likitocin don cire abubuwan da aka buga na lalata ivermectin:
Duk da Matsalolin FDA da Wadatar Bayanai, 'Yan Jarida sun Manne akan Labarun Anti-Ivermectin
Ko da bayan fuskar FDA, a ranar 26 ga Maris, 2024, wani ɗan jaridar Los Angeles Times ya buga wani shafi yana kiran kau da tweets na FDA "mara tushe"Unilaterally ayyana ivermectin a matsayin"a ƙarshe an nuna ba shi da amfani a kan COVID-19,” kwatanta ivermectin zuwa “mai maciji,” da kuma siffanta waxanda ke faxakarwa da shi a matsayin “masu satar hancin mara amfani amma mai riba(Game da da'awar 'mai riba', yana da kyau a lura cewa tun da yake ivermectin yana da yawa kuma ba shi da tsada, don haka ba ya da amfani ga kowa).
Game da zaɓin da FDA ta yi don daidaita ƙarar da ake yi wa ivermectin, da Cibiyar Nazarin Magunguna ta FDA da Jagorancin Bincike ba "harbin kanta a kafa”Kamar yadda LA Times shela. Da alama cewa FDA a kaikaice yunƙurin hana ƙarin kunya yiwuwa saboda yanzu ya gane cewa ivermectin ikirarin sun kasance ba daidai ba da kuma m tare da kowace rana wucewa. Amma a ina hakan ya bar AphA, ASHP, ko AMA waɗanda suka dogara sosai kan waɗannan hanyoyin haɗin FDA da aka share a cikin sakin labaran su?
Shiru Mai Kunya Daga APHA, ASHP, AMA biyo bayan shafe Abubuwan da FDA ta yi amfani da su a cikin Sanarwar Jarida:
Sama da wata guda bayan haka, kuma har zuwa ranar buga wannan littafin, babu ɗayan waɗannan ƙungiyoyin da ke da abu guda don faɗi game da fitar da jaridun su suna ambaton labaran FDA da aka cire yanzu. A zahiri, ga alamar matakin damuwarsu: mako guda bayan FDA ta amince da cire abubuwan da aka buga a cikin ivermectin, sabon shugaban kakakin APhA da likitan harhada magunguna. Mary Klein tana "rawa mai farin ciki]” da kuma ba da jawabin amincewarta a hukumance sanye da kunun Mickey Mouse.
ASHP's (A/K/A mai suna "#MedicationExperts") har yanzu yana nuna shafin sa na hukuma tare da likitocin da ke sanye da kayan aikin tiyata marasa inganci, marasa amfani duk da cutar ta ƙare sama da shekara guda da ta gabata., da Binciken Cochrane yana nuna cewa irin wannan abin rufe fuska ne kusan lalle ba shi da inganci.
Jami'an AMA sun mayar da hankali kan yin rubuce-rubuce da yawa kan batutuwan transgender da ayyana canjin yanayi a matsayin rikicin lafiyar jama'a - duk yayin da suke yin watsi da tasirin sa, kuskure, maganganun da ba su dace ba akan ivermectin.
Dubi waɗannan hotunan allo (duk daga Maris 31st, 2024) daga gidajen yanar gizon sa:
A taƙaice, APhA, ASHP, da AMA sun yi shuru a kan wannan batu yayin da suke mai da hankali kan labaransu akan komai amma gazawarsu na kare marasa lafiyarsu. Har wala yau, fitattun jaridun nasu zauna kan layi, tare da matattun alaƙa da hukumomin gwamnati. A cikin makauniyar goyan bayan bayanan da ba daidai ba har yanzu suna nuni ga cire shafukan yanar gizo, yanzu su kadai ne a cikin sanarwar ivermectin.
Layin ƙasa: ivermectin ya kasance, kuma yana da aminci kuma ya fi tasiri ga Covid lokacin lokaci da kuma doso daidai, kuma ƙarƙashin kulawar likita, duk da abin da ƙungiyoyi da jami'an tarayya suka ayyana. A gaskiya ma, ivermectin's general antiviral aiki cikakken mulki har ma a taimaka wa cutar murar tsuntsaye (cutar Avian) a cikin dabbobi da mutane, maimakon wani labari mara kyau-hakika-hawa "gudun warp" mRNA "alurar rigakafi" tare da ƙaramar ƙararrawa mara iyaka.
Rikodi na baya da na yanzu akan ivermectin yana buƙatar a daidaita. Mun san akwai muhimmin (amma mara gaskiya) jerin wanda yake alhaki don batar da bayanan da aka buga, amma za a gudanar da kowa lissafin kuɗi?
RA'AYI: KADA KA daina ko fara shan kowane magani ba tare da fara tattaunawa da likitan kantin magani ko likitan da ka sani kuma ka amince da shi ba.
-
Dokta David Gortler masanin ilimin harhada magunguna ne, likitan harhada magunguna, masanin kimiyyar bincike kuma tsohon memba na Babban Jami'in Gudanarwa na FDA wanda ya zama babban mai ba da shawara ga Kwamishinan FDA akan al'amuran: Al'amuran ka'idoji na FDA, amincin magunguna da manufofin kimiyya na FDA. Shi tsohon jami'ar Yale ne da kuma jami'ar Georgetown didactic farfesa a fannin harhada magunguna da fasahar kere-kere, tare da sama da shekaru goma na koyar da ilimin kimiyya da bincike na benci, a zaman wani bangare na kwarewarsa ta kusan shekaru ashirin a ci gaban muggan kwayoyi. Shi babban ɗan'uwa ne a fannin kiwon lafiya da manufofin FDA a Gidauniyar Heritage a Washington DC da 2023 Brownstone Fellow.
Duba dukkan posts
