Na buga kafin a kanmu Missouri da Biden karar, wanda jihohin Missouri da Louisiana - tare da masu gabatar da kara guda hudu (Jay Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, kungiyar bayar da shawarwari Health Freedom Louisiana, da naku da gaske) suka wakilta. New Civil Liberties Alliance - suna karar Hukumar Biden saboda zargin keta hakkin fadin albarkacin baki.
A yanzu muna da kwakkwarar shaidar cewa bangaren zartarwa na gwamnatin tarayya yana hada baki da kafofin watsa labarun don tantance abubuwan da ke cikin kafafen sada zumunta - wadanda suka hada da Twitter, Google, LinkedIn, Facebook da Instagram - tambayoyi, kalubale, ko kuma suka saba wa manufofin gwamnati.
A wannan makon, alkalin kotun tarayya a shari’ar ba roƙonmu na samun shaidar tuhume-tuhume, a ƙarƙashin rantsuwa, daga jami’an gwamnati na yanzu ko na tsohuwar gwamnati:
- Daraktan NIAID kuma babban mashawarcin likitocin fadar White House Dr. Anthony Fauci
- Mataimakin Mataimakin Shugaban kasa da Darakta na Dabarun Dijital na Fadar White House Rob Flaherty OR tsohon Babban Shawarar COVID-19 na Fadar White House Andrew Slavit
- Tsohon Sakataren Yada Labarai na Fadar White House Jennifer Psaki
- Wakilin Musamman na FBI Elvis Chan
- Daraktan CISA Jen gabas KO jami'in CISA Lauren Protentis
- Janar Surgeon Vivek Murthy asalin
- Shugaban CDC na Reshen Watsa Labarai na Dijital Carol Crawford ne adam wata
- Mukaddashin Kodinetan Cibiyar Haɗin Kan Duniya ta Ma'aikatar Jiha Daniel Kimmage.
Yana da kyau a lura cewa Fauci (wataƙila?) ya amsa tambayoyinsa da aka rubuta a rubuce, yana musun cewa yana da wata hanyar sadarwa tare da dandalin sada zumunta. Amma kuma ya mayar da martani a wata hanya mai yuwuwar zamewa—musamman, ya ba da damar Jill Harper ta sanya hannu kan martanin NAIAD, duk da cewa lauyoyinmu sun yi masa rubutaccen tambayoyin. Alkalin ya ki daukar rubutacciyar kalma-da-wakili a matsayin isa, kamar yadda umarnin kotu ya bayyana:
Wadanda ake tuhuma na gwamnati sun gabatar da martani ga masu gabatar da kara a madadin Dr. Fauci, suna masu tabbatar da cewa ba shi da wata hanyar sadarwa ta kai tsaye da duk wani dandalin sada zumunta dangane da tantancewa. Masu gabatar da kara sun yi gardama kan cewa bai kamata a bukaci kawai su karbi wadancan bayanan bargo kamar yadda aka gabatar da su ba, kuma suna jayayya da dalilai uku da ya sa ya kamata a yi wa Dr. Fauci tambayoyi a karkashin rantsuwa.
Da farko, Masu shigar da kara sun ce Dr. Fauci ya ki tabbatarwa a karkashin rantsuwar nasa martanin tambayoyin da ya saba wa umarnin Kotun. Dokta Jill Harper ce ta tabbatar da martanin NIAID, wanda ba a ambaci sunansa ba a cikin korafin. Don haka, Dr. Fauci bai yi wata magana ba a ƙarƙashin rantsuwa game da sadarwarsa da dandamali na kafofin watsa labarun, wanda ya saba wa umarnin Kotun game da binciken da ya umarci Dr. Fauci ya ba da amsa tambayoyi. Kotun na ganin muhimmancin sanya Dr. Fauci yin kalamai a karkashin rantsuwa dangane da batutuwan da suka shafi wannan batu.
Na gaba, Masu gabatar da kara suna jayayya cewa ko da Dr. Fauci zai iya tabbatar da cewa bai taɓa yin magana da dandamali na kafofin watsa labarun game da cece-kuce ba, akwai dalilai masu gamsarwa waɗanda ke ba da shawarar Dr. Fauci ya yi aiki ta hanyar masu shiga tsakani, kuma ya yi aiki a madadin wasu, wajen samar da bayanan kafofin watsa labarun na ingantaccen ra'ayoyin kimiyya.. Masu shigar da kara suna jayayya cewa ko da Dr. Fauci ya yi aiki a kaikaice ko a matsayin mai shiga tsakani a madadin wasu, har yanzu yana da nasaba da shawarar farko na masu gabatar da kara. Kotun ta amince.
A ƙarshe, Masu shigar da kara suna jayayya cewa amincin Dokta Fauci yana cikin tambaya kan al'amuran da suka shafi COVID-19 da ake zaton "lalata" tun 2020. Musamman, Masu gabatar da kara sun bayyana cewa Dr. Fauci ya yi bayani a bainar jama'a game da ingancin abin rufe fuska, yawan adadin mutanen da ake bukata don rigakafin garken garken, tallafin NIAID na binciken kwayar cutar “ciwon aiki” a Wuhan, ka'idar leak, da sauransu. Masu shigar da kara sun bukaci cewa kalaman nasa kan wadannan muhimman batutuwa sun shafi batun da ke gabansu kuma wasu dalilai ne da ya sa a tsige Dr. Fauci. Masu shigar da kara sun tabbatar da cewa bai kamata a bukaci kawai su amince da "karshin bargo na son kai" na Dr. Fauci da aka bayar daga wanin kansa ba ta fuskar daraja.Kotun ta amince.
Kotun ta kammala da cewa rubutun Fauci bai isa ba idan aka ba da wasu shaidun da ke cikin rikodin, wasu daga cikinsu an gabatar da su a cikin korafinmu kuma an taƙaita su cikin umarnin alkali:
Bayan ta yi nazari kan hukunce-hukuncen masu kara da wadanda ake kara, kotun ta gano cewa masu kara sun tabbatar da hakan. Dr. Fauci yana da ilimin sirri game da batun da ya shafi yin katsalandan a cikin kafofin watsa labarun kamar yadda ya shafi COVID-19 da wasu batutuwan COVID-19. Kotun ta yi la'akari da cewa Dr. Fauci babban jami'i ne, musamman kasancewarsa Daraktan Cibiyar Kula da Allergy da Cututtuka na Kasa da kuma Babban Mashawarcin Lafiya ga Shugaban Kasa. Kotun na ganin nauyin da zai iya dorawa Dr. Fauci sakamakon tsige shi shine na lokacinsa.
Duk da haka, Kotun ta amince cewa duk mutumin da za a tsige dole ne ya sadaukar da lokacinsa, kuma ba ta ga wani nauyi da aka dora wa Dr. Fauci wanda ya zarce bukatar kotun na samun bayanan domin yanke hukunci mafi inganci kan karar da masu shigar da kara suka shigar. A ƙarshe, Kotu tana sane da dalilai da yawa da ya sa ya kamata a ɗauki tuƙin Dr. Fauci.
Na farko shine saƙon imel da ake samu a bainar jama'a waɗanda ke tabbatar da cewa Dr. Fauci yana sadarwa kuma yana aiki azaman mai shiga tsakani ga wasu don tantance bayanai daga rabawa a cikin kafofin watsa labarun da yawa. Na biyu shi ne cewa Dr. Fauci har yanzu bai bayar da wata sanarwa ba a karkashin rantsuwa a kan wannan batu. Na uku shi ne, Kotun ba ta da shakku kan cewa Dr. Fauci yana hulda da manyan jami'an kafofin watsa labarun, wanda ke da matukar tasiri a cikin lamarin.
Bugu da ƙari, jigon wannan shari'ar shine ainihin haƙƙin 'yancin faɗar albarkacin baki. Duk wani nauyi da za a iya dorawa Dr. Fauci gaba daya ya fi mahimmancin zargin masu shigar da kara na danne 'yancin fadin albarkacin baki. Don haka, Kotun ta gano cewa masu shigar da kara sun gamsu da nauyin da ya rataya a wuyansu na tabbatar da dalilin da ya sa gabatar da Dokta Anthony Fauci ya zama dole a wannan shari'ar, kuma akwai yanayi na musamman. Don haka, ANA UMURCI cewa Dr. Anthony Fauci ya ba da hadin kai kan bukatar masu gabatar da kara na a tsige shi saboda dalilan binciken farko da suka yi.
An yi sharhi a cikin 'yan jaridu a wannan makon kan wannan sabon ci gaba a cikin lamarin. Miranda Devine a cikin New York PostMisali, ya bayyana karar a matsayin "wanda ya rigaya ya bankado wasu shaidu masu ban mamaki na wani katafaren shiri na cin hanci da rashawa da aka dafa tsakanin gwamnatin tarayya da Big Tech wanda zai zama 'yan gurguzu Sin girman kai.” Ita New York Post labarin ya bayyana yadda littafin ya kasance ƙarƙashin babban yatsan wannan gwamnatin ta cece-kuce da ya kai ga zaɓen shugaban ƙasa:
Wadanda abin ya shafa na Biden-Big Tech “kamfanin sanya ido” sun hada da The Post, wanda Mafarautan Biden Facebook da Twitter sun danne fallasa kwamfutar a cikin Oktoba 2020 bayan FBI Ya tafi Facebook, yana gargadin shi da takamaiman takamaiman don lura da "juji" na ɓarna na Rasha, dangane da Joe Biden, tare da kamanceceniya da labaran mu.
"Muna zargin cewa manyan jami'an gwamnatin Biden sun hada baki da waɗancan kamfanonin kafofin watsa labarun don murkushe magana game da labarin kwamfutar tafi-da-gidanka na Hunter Biden, asalin COVID-19, ingancin abin rufe fuska, da amincin zaɓe."
Takaddamar da ke da alaƙa da zargin "bayanai" game da kulle-kulle na cutar sankara, alluran rigakafi da COVID-19, kuma sun haɗa da abubuwa daga manyan cututtukan cututtukan cututtukan cututtukan cututtukan cututtukan cututtukan cuta da masana kimiyyar lafiyar jama'a da ke da alaƙa da Babban Sanarwar Barrington, wanda ya tabbatar da lokaci ya zama daidai kuma a ƙarshe yawancin abin da CDC ta karɓi shi azaman manufofin hukuma.
Hakazalika, yin tsokaci kan karar mu a wannan makon, Tyler Durden mara tsoro ya kare a ZeroHedge aka bayyana yadda ita ma wannan gwamnatin ta yi wa littafinsa takunkumi don yin sharhi kan asalin cutar:
Dubi tsarin lokaci ya nuna cewa a cikin Fabrairu na 2020, Fauci, tsohon Daraktan NIH Francis Collins, da wasu masu ba da shawara da yawa sun tattauna batun. SantaBatar labarin akan takarda da aka riga aka buga daga Indiya wanda ke nuna cewa Covid-19 yana da kama da HIV. A cikin yini guda, Twitter ya dakatar da mu saboda buga shaidar cewa Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan - wacce ke gudanar da gwaje-gwajen da NIH ke bayarwa don yin bat Covid. mafi m ga mutane - na iya samun wani abu da ke da alaƙa da sabon nau'in Covid-19 wanda ya barke a cikin gari a kasuwar rigar.
Uzurin Twitter? Da mu 'doxxed' masanin kimiyyar kasar Sin, amfani da bayanan da ake samu na jama'a (watau ba doxxing ba), wanda ya ƙirƙiri aika aika aiki mai alaƙa da bincikensa akan bat Covid.
Masu gabatar da kara sun yi iƙirarin cewa Fauci ya dage kan yin la'akari da "maganar da ke da babban sahihancin kimiyya da kuma babban tasiri a cikin ƙasa" wanda ya saba wa ra'ayoyin Fauci.
Fauci, alal misali, an yi magana a ciki kiran waya mai dogon garkuwa tare da wasu masana kimiyya don ɓata duk wata ka'idar cewa COVID-19 sakamakon "leb ɗin lab" ne a Wuhan, China. Masanan sun ci gaba da rubuta wata takarda da ke tsawatar wa wasu da suka bude ido kan ka'idar.
Idan ka'idar leak ɗin ta kasance gaskiya ce, bi da bi, hakan yana nufin Fauci na iya kasancewa mai yuwuwar sa hannu wajen bayar da tallafin bincike kan ƙwayoyin cuta da suka haifar da cutar da ta kashe miliyoyin duniya, in ji masu gabatar da kara. Wannan saboda Fauci ya ba da tallafin bincike mai haɗari "samun-aiki" a Cibiyar Nazarin Kwayoyin cuta ta Wuhan ta hanyar masu shiga tsakani kamar EcoHealth Alliance.
A ƙarshen Janairu 2020 da farkon Fabrairu 2020, Fauci ya kuma tuntuɓar Shugaban Facebook Mark Zuckerberg a cikin maganganun magana game da martanin gwamnati na COVID-19. Facebook sannan ana zargin ya ci gaba da yin sharhi kan ka'idar leak, in ji masu gabatar da kara.
The Epoch Times Hakanan ya buga cikakken bayani Labari wannan makon, wanda ya hada da takaitaccen bayani na uku daga cikin sauran jami’an da Alkali Doughty ya bayar da umarnin a tsige su:
Kotun ta kuma gano cewa, Flaherty, Psaki, Andy Slavitt, da sauran jami'ai suma suna da masaniyar kan su game da batutuwan da ake zarginsu da satar bayanai tare da ba da umarnin a tsige su. Doughty ya ce akwai bukatu mai yawa da ake bukata Flaherty da za a tsige don tantance ko an “gaske haƙƙin ‘yancin fadin albarkacin baki” sakamakon zargin haɗin gwiwa tsakanin manyan jami’an gwamnatin Biden da Big Tech. Masu gabatar da kara sun yi iƙirarin cewa Flaherty yana da “fasalin” tarurrukan baka tare da Twitter, Meta, da YouTube kan shakkun alluran rigakafi da kuma yaƙi da rashin gaskiya da ke da alaƙa da COVID-19.
Alkalin ya ce akwai “bukatun bukatu” na shigar da karar Slavitt, wanda ya yi aiki a matsayin babban mashawarcin COVID-19 na Fadar White House. Doughty ya lura cewa kalaman Slavitt a kan faifan podcast "ya nuna yana da takamaiman ilimi kamar yadda ya shafi" batutuwan da ke cikin karar.
Umurnin kotun ya ba da misali da jerin kalaman da jama'a suka yi psaki lokacin da ta yi aiki a matsayin sakatariyar yada labaran fadar White House, ciki har da yin kira ga dandalin sada zumunta don daidaito wajen hana masu magana da ba su so.
"Psaki ya yi maganganu da yawa wadanda suka dace da shigar da gwamnati ke yi a cikin kokarin da ake yi na dandalin sada zumunta na tace masu amfani da ita a fadin hukumar don raba bayanan da suka shafi COVID-19," in ji Doughty a cikin hukuncin nasa.
Don haka yana kama da wannan shari'ar na iya ci gaba da samun ƙarin ban sha'awa. Ku kasance da mu a nan domin samun karin labarai. Kuma a halin yanzu, kada ku ji tsoron faɗin abin da kuke tunani a kan layi - tare da ladabi da wayewa, ba shakka, amma ba tare da murkushe abin da kuka sani ko kuka gaskata gaskiya ba ne.
Sake bugawa daga marubucin Mayarwa
-
Aaron Kheriaty, Babban mashawarcin Cibiyar Brownstone, masani ne a Cibiyar Da'a da Harkokin Jama'a, DC. Shi tsohon farfesa ne na ilimin hauka a Jami'ar California a Makarantar Magunguna ta Irvine, inda ya kasance darektan da'a na likitanci.
Duba dukkan posts
