Peter Principle (def, Wikipedia): The Peter ka'idar wani ra'ayi ne a cikin gudanarwa wanda Laurence J. Peter ya kirkiro wanda ya lura cewa mutane a cikin matsayi suna tasowa zuwa "matakin rashin kwarewa: ana ciyar da ma'aikata bisa la'akari da nasarar da suka samu a ayyukan da suka gabata har sai sun kai matakin da ba su da kwarewa, saboda basira a cikin wani aiki ba dole ba ne a fassara zuwa wani.
Me yasa ya kamata ku damu da sha'awar sha'awar Dokta Peter Marks, MD, PhD? Shugaban Cibiyar Nazarin Halittar Halitta ta FDA (CBER) da ya yi murabus kwanan nan? Domin Dokta Peter Marks yana ba da kyakkyawan nazari game da abin da ke faruwa lokacin da gwamnati ta daidaita don karɓuwa maimakon kyakkyawan matsayi a matsayin mai kula da kimiyya (bureaucrat).
Yana da wuya a sami gogaggun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun mutane don cike ayyukan gwamnati. Albashin yana kusan 2/3 ko ƙasa da matsayi na kwatankwacin matsayi a cikin masana'antu, musamman a cikin masana'antar harhada magunguna. Da kyar hanya ce mai kyau don haɓaka dangi da siyan wannan mulkin mallaka mai gadaje biyar a Alexandria, McClain, ko Potomac wanda zai nuna a sarari ga abokan aikin ku yadda kuke da mahimmanci. Aikin gabaɗaya aiki ne na yau da kullun na yau da kullun, tare da tudun takarda da ma'aikatan da ake buƙata daban-daban da ayyukan gudanarwa suka haɗa su. Haɗari da yawa idan mai gudanarwa ya nisanta daga daidaitattun matakai. Akwai ƙananan dama don ƙirƙira ko ganowa. Manyan masu hankali suna son 'yancin kai. An kwatanta wannan yunƙurin ta hanyar babban tashe-tashen hankula da kusan duk waɗanda suka bar gwamnati suka ɗauki mukamai a Pharma - har ma da masu satar fasaha da wannabees.
Abin da babban aiki a gwamnati ke bayarwa shine iko da matsayi. Kuna yin yanke shawara waɗanda ke tasiri sosai kan ribar masana'antu da aka tsara. Kowa yana son hankalin ku ga aikin dabbar su. 'Yan jarida suna ba ku saboda karfin da ke motsawa "samun damar aikin jarida."
Wadanda suka iya, yi. Wadanda ba za su iya ba, tsarawa.
Ina tunawa da misalai biyu na hikimar da aka maimaita akai-akai game da ilimi. Misali na farko shi ne wadanda suka himmatu wajen zama Shugaban Sashen suna neman mulki ne a kan takwarorinsu, kuma su ne wadanda ya kamata a kauce musu musamman wajen zabar Shugaban Sashen ko Shugaban Kasa. Na biyu kuma shi ne dalilin da ya sa siyasar ilimi ta yi kaurin suna, shi ne, babu abin da za a iya fada.
Bayan zabensa na farko a matsayin Mataimakin Darakta CBER, Dokta Marks ya tashi da sauri zuwa matsayi a cikin FDA, kuma an ba shi lada tare da babban matsayi na matsayi a Cibiyar Kimiyya ta Kasa - ba bisa ga basirarsa ba, nasarorin kimiyya, ƙwarewar kimiyyar ka'idoji ko ƙwarewar fasaha - amma saboda ya ba da shawarar rage ƙa'idodin masana'antar harhada magunguna ta FDA kafin nadin masana'antar.
A wannan lokacin, me yasa kuka yanke shawarar canza hanyoyin sana'a?
Ya kasance cakuda dalilai na sirri da na sana'a, amma abin tuƙi shine, a lokacin da nake Brigham da Mata, ni da matata na da 'ya'ya biyu kuma ina son samun ƙarin lokacin iyali.
Don haka, na ƙaura zuwa matsayi a cikin masana'antar harhada magunguna na ƴan shekaru. Ya zama lokaci mai albarka na aiki na: Na shiga ciki nasarar amincewar ƙa'ida ta farko ta bakin ƙarfe chelator a Amurka da ya taimaka wajen saita alkibla amincewar ka'idoji na wasu samfuran biyu waɗanda ke kan kasuwa yanzu.
Ayyukan da na yi a wurin don kawo wannan maganin zuwa kasuwa yana da ban sha'awa, amma mai ra'ayi a cikina yana so ya koma ga kula da marasa lafiya da lafiyar jama'a. Don haka, na koma likitancin ilimi a Jami’ar Yale. Yayin da nake can, na taimaka fadada sabis na cutar sankarar bargo. Daga ƙarshe, na yi aiki a matsayin babban jami'in kula da lafiya na farko na sabuwar Cibiyar Ciwon daji ta Smilow.
Bayan ka koma aikin likitancin ilimi, me ya sa ka yanke shawarar komawa bangaren gwamnati?
Na ji daɗin aikina a Yale kaɗan, amma a lokacin na ga wani talla a cikin New England Journal of Medicine don matsayin mataimakin darektan Cibiyar Nazarin Halittar Halitta ta FDA (CBER). Bayanin aikin ya yi kama da kyau tare da horarwa da gogewa, don haka na nema. Ban yi tsammanin faruwa da yawa ba, kuma abin da ya faru ke nan. Na shagaltu da wasu ayyuka kuma a zahiri na manta cewa na nema.
Bayan haka, bayan watanni da yawa, na sami wasiƙa da ta gayyace ni don yin hira. Wannan tsari ya ci gaba har tsawon watanni, wanda ya ƙare tare da ba ni mukamin. Na fara mukamin mataimakin darakta na CBER a watan Janairun 2012 kuma na karbi mukamin darakta a farkon shekarar 2016.
Kawai a ce, a cikin masana'antar harhada magunguna "an sa hannu a ciki" da "taimakawa saita alkiblar" wasu hanyoyin da ake cewa "Na taka rawar gani a cikin ƙungiyar da ta yi waɗannan abubuwa." Babu wata shaida da ta nuna cewa ya gudanar da wani babban alƙawari a lokacin da yake cikin masana'antu, kamar yadda ya kasance a baya yana kan hanyar "likitanci" a cikin alƙawuran likitancin ilimin kimiyya - maimakon rashin ƙarfi ga MD, PhD. Da alama ya “cika tsammanin” ta wannan matakin kafin FDA na aikinsa, amma tabbas bai wuce yadda ake tsammani ba.
Mahimman bayanin falsafar Dokta Marks laissez-faire shine "Operation Warp Speed" (OWS), yayin da duka ka'idoji da tsarin bioethical don maganin kwayoyin halitta da ka'idojin samfurin rigakafi da gwajin asibiti da aka haɓaka a cikin shekarun da suka gabata na ƙwarewar duniya da yarjejeniya an misalta su a cikin kwandon shara. Dukkanin sun dogara ne akan haɓakawa da ƙirar ƙirar ƙira wanda ke nuna adadin mace-mace na 3.4% (CFR) don kamuwa da cuta ta SARS-CoV-2, lokacin da ainihin CFR ta kasance daidai da barkewar cutar mura ta yanayi - kamar yadda aka nuna a farkon barkewar ta NIH Darakta na yanzu Jay Bhattacharya. OWS da cutarwar duniya da aka samu daga nau'ikan alluran rigakafin cutar sankara na Covid waɗanda suka haifar da marasa lafiya don samar da manyan matakan furotin "karu" mai guba na tsawon lokaci duk suna gudana kai tsaye daga falsafar tsari da ayyukan Dr. Peter Marks.
Abokin aikin Dokta Marks a cikin wannan yunƙurin ya kasance Mataimakin Sakatare HHS na Amsar Cutar (ASPR) Dokta Robert Kadlec, sanannen ma'aikacin "zurfin yanayi" mai dangantaka ta kud da kud da kamfanin da ke tallata rigakafin Anthrax (Emergent Biosolutions), Hukumar Leken Asiri ta Tsaro, da Dick Cheney.
A yayin annobar COVID-19 Na sami damar kallon hangen nesa da na ɗauka don Operation Warp Speed a cikin Maris 2020 tare da haɗin gwiwar Dr. Robert Kadlec zama gaskiya a karkashin jagorancin Sakataren HHS Azar da Shugaba Trump saboda jajircewar ma'aikatan gwamnati a FDA da sauran wurare a fadin gwamnati. A FDA, ƙoƙarin da ma'aikata ke yi a duk faɗin hukumar ya haifar da haɓaka haɓakar alluran rigakafin cutar, tare da cika ƙa'idodin inganci, aminci, da tasiri da jama'ar Amurka ke tsammani. Babu shakka allurar rigakafin sun rage cututtuka da mace-mace daga COVID-19 a Amurka da sauran wurare.
Dr. Peter Marks wasikar murabus, Maris 28, 2025
Dangane da abin da nake damuwa, yana da wuya a tabbatar da cewa Shugaba Donald Trump, wanda ainihin ikonsa ya kasance a cikin dukiya, ci gaban kasuwanci, tallace-tallace, da kuma kafofin watsa labaru suna da alhakin OWS sai dai kawai cewa ya dogara da shi sosai kuma ya kasa yin shakkar masu kula da kimiyya suna ba shi shawara - musamman ciki har da Drs. Peter Marks da Robert Kadlec.
Dokta Peter Marks, MD, PhD, ya yanke shawarar barin aikin tarayya bayan shekaru goma sha huɗu a Cibiyar Nazarin Halittar Halitta ta FDA (CBER), a fili a mayar da martani ga Sakataren HHS yana nuna cewa yana da zaɓi na yin murabus da son rai ko kuma a dakatar da shi saboda dalili. Ko don haka rahotannin jaridu na kamfanoni. A lokacin murabus dinsa, Dr. Marks ya yi hidima ga jama'a a matsayin Daraktan CBER tun 2016 (shekaru uku kafin Covid), kuma kafin hakan ya kasance Mataimakin Darakta CBER daga 2012-2016 (source).
Kamar yadda yake daidai da aikin HR a cikin waɗannan nau'ikan ayyukan ma'aikata, Sakataren HHS, Mista Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (ko ofishinsa), ya ƙi yin sharhi ko tabbatar da cewa wannan shine abin da ya faru. Don haka, ba mu da wani bayani game da menene takamaiman dalilin dakatarwar da zai kasance. Abin da muke da shi shine kwafin Dr. Marks' FDA wasikar murabus mai kwanan wata 28 Maris (wanda aka makala a ƙasa) wanda a ciki ya ce:
A cikin shekaru 13 da suka gabata na yi iya ƙoƙarina don tabbatar da cewa mun yi amfani da ingantaccen ilimi da inganci don amfanin lafiyar jama'a. Kamar yadda kuka sani, na kasance a shirye in yi aiki don magance damuwar Sakatare game da amincin rigakafin rigakafi da bayyana gaskiya ta hanyar ji daga jama'a da aiwatar da tarurrukan jama'a iri-iri da hulɗa tare da Kwalejin Kimiyya, Injiniya, da Magunguna ta ƙasa. Duk da haka, ya bayyana a fili cewa gaskiya da gaskiya ba sa son Sakatare, sai dai yana fatan a tabbatar da gaskiyarsa da karya.
Fatana shine a cikin shekaru masu zuwa. harin da ba a taba ganin irinsa ba kan gaskiyar kimiyya wanda ya yi illa ga lafiyar jama'a a cikin al'ummarmu ya zo karshe ta yadda 'yan kasar za su iya cin gajiyar ci gaban da aka samu a fannin kimiyyar likitanci. Ko da yake ba zan yi nadama ba don kasancewa cikin aikin nan gaba a FDA, Ina matukar godiya da samun damar yin aiki tare da irin wannan gungun mutane masu ban mamaki a matsayin ma'aikata a FDA kuma zan yi iya ƙoƙarina don ci gaba da inganta lafiyar jama'a a nan gaba.
A cikin yin ƙwazo don wannan maƙala, ina so in fahimci ilimin Dakta Marks, nasarorin kimiyya, da cancantar gudanar da mafi rinjayen hukumomin Yammacin Turai don nazarin halittu, alluran rigakafi, samfuran jini, da magungunan ƙwayoyin cuta da kwayoyin halitta, don haka nemo bayanai game da muhimman abubuwan ci gaban aiki ga Dr. Marks gami da CV ko Google Scholar listing (Google Scholar is a leading academic resource listing). Babu komai. Nada. Kamar an goge tarihinsa daga intanet.
Ya yi ikirarin cewa an horar da shi a matsayin Ph.D. Masanin ilimin kwayoyin halitta (me yasa wannan batu kuke tambaya? Duba ƙasa), amma a cikin binciken tarayya PubMed Takaddun bayanai kawai na sami takaddun ilimin halitta guda biyar marasa ban mamaki a lokacin horon PhD. Ya yi iƙirarin cewa shi ƙwararren masanin lafiyar jama'a ne, amma ba zan iya samun wata shaida ta horo na yau da kullun ko gogewa a cikin lafiyar jama'a, bincike na asibiti, ko al'amuran ƙa'ida ba kafin ya shiga FDA. A cikin aikinsa na ilimi ya tashi zuwa matakin "Malami," wanda shine babban matsayi mai girman kai ga MD. PhD. Ainihin, ba zan iya samun wata shaida ta ƙwararrun kimiyya, jagoranci, ko nasarori masu ban mamaki yayin binciken ilimin kimiyya da na asibiti na Dr. Marks.
Me yasa cancantar kimiyya da gogewar Dokta Peter Marks ke da mahimmanci? Me yasa na mai da hankali kan nitpicking waɗannan nuances? Manyan dalilai guda huɗu sun samo asali a cikin ƙwarewar mutum:
Na farko, na sadu da shi ta hanyar Zuƙowa a ranar 03 ga Yuni, 2021 don tattaunawa game da takaddun ƙaddamar da tsarin mulkin Jafananci na Pfizer wanda Dr. Byran Bridle ya gano akan sabar mai kula da harkokin Jafananci. Waɗannan takaddun sun ba da rahoto a fili cewa Pfizer ya gaza cika duka FDA da ƙa'idodin ƙa'idodi na duniya tare da binciken da ba na asibiti ba game da rigakafin mRNA Covid, kuma duk da haka FDA/CBER/Marks na ci gaba da ba da izini na Amfani da Gaggawa. Imanina a lokacin shine cewa FDA tana aiki da bangaskiya mai kyau, amma ba ta da ƙwarewa ta musamman da ake buƙata don gani ta hanyar ɓatar da bayanan da Pfizer ya ƙaddamar (musamman game da rarrabawar kwayoyin halitta da toxicities na samfurin allura da sakamakon canja wurin kwayoyin halitta). A cikin wannan taron, wanda kuma wakilin FDA PR ya halarta, Dokta Marks ya nuna cewa ya ga ƙarin bayanai daga Pfizer (abin da yanzu ake kira "Pfizer Papers,") kuma babu wani abu da ya damu da shi. Bugu da ƙari kuma, Dokta Marks ya tambaye ni - a matsayina na ƙwararre a yankin - don hana sukar jama'a har sai ya iya sakin bayanan tallafi.
Wannan dabara ce ta yaudara da karya, kuma na kyamaci a yi min karya da kuma yi min magudi. Ba shi da niyyar sakin bayanan ga jama'a, wanda bayanan daga karshe ya bukaci kotu ta dauki matakin sakin. Ba don irin wannan da karkatar da kai ba, da na yi magana tun da farko kuma da karfi, amma na yi watsi da suka na saboda girmama abin da na yi imani abokin aiki ne mai gaskiya. Bugu da ƙari kuma, na tabbata cewa Dokta Peter Marks ba a lokacin ba ne kuma ya kasance ba shi da cancanta ta horo da baya don fahimtar yanayi da lahani a cikin bayanan marasa lafiya da Pfizer ya gabatar don tallafawa wannan samfurin.
Na biyu, Dokta Peter Marks ba shi da kwarewa a cikin yanki na musamman na fasaha da samfurori na maganin kwayoyin halitta. Digiri na biyu na iya kasancewa a cikin “Kwayoyin Halitta na Halitta,” amma babu wata alama da ke nuna cewa an horar da shi sosai a kan ilimin Halittar Halitta na zamani - wanda yana ɗaya daga cikin abubuwan da na ke so. Shi ma ba shi da gogewa ko horo a fannin rigakafin rigakafi, ko ilimin rigakafi. Jahilcinsa a waɗannan yankuna ya bayyana a sarari yayin rikicin Covid. Wannan rashin gwaninta da jahilci, haɗe da matsakaicin matsakaicin ilimin kimiyya, sun taka muhimmiyar rawa wajen ba da damar jagoranci na FDA mara kyau a lokacin rikicin Covid. Yana da mahimmanci a fahimci cewa, yayin rikicin Covid, Amurka da musamman FDA ta Amurka sun kafa ƙa'idodi don manufofin tsarin duniya tsakanin duk NATO, EU, masu alaƙa da Burtaniya, da abokan haɗin gwiwar leken asirin ido Biyar. Siyasar manufofin kayyadewa a cikin dukkan waɗannan jahohin ƙasa da ƙungiyoyin manyan ƙasashe sun gudana kai tsaye daga kuskuren bincike da fahimtar Dr. Peter Marks.
Juya zuwa ga wata muƙala ta kwanan nan daga “A Midwestern Doctor” wacce ta taƙaita wannan juyi na abubuwan da suka faru:
Ɗaya daga cikin muhimman masu fafutuka da za su zo gaba shine Philip Krause, wanda ya yi aiki a cikin FDA har tsawon shekaru 30. Wannan ya faru ne saboda Krause tare da babban nasa kai tsaye Marian Gruber sun kasance manyan jami'an FDA da ke kula da allurar rigakafin Amurka, kuma a ƙarshen Agusta 2021, a tsakiyar ƙima mafi mahimmancin ƙima na rigakafi na FDA a tarihi, ba zato ba tsammani suka yi murabus (wanda ya kasance babban taron girgizar kasa da kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun suka rufe shi har ma sun ambaci hakan saboda matsin lamba na siyasa daga Fadar White House don masu haɓaka Covid). Bayan wannan, Krause da Gruber sun buga labarin a cikin Lancet. Krause kuma ya buga jerin editoci (misali, Wannan, Wannan, Wannan a cikin Washington Post) jayayya da shirin ƙarfafawa na yanzu.
Bayan haka, ya ba da shaida a gaban Majalisa game da yadda aka sarrafa allurar Covid.
Dubi abin da ke gaba don cikakkun bayanai na wannan shaidar-
Duk Maris 02, 2025 Substack muqala mai taken "Me yasa FDA Greenlight ta yi allurar COVID? Shaida na baya-bayan nan sun bayyana yanayin cin hanci da rashawa a cikin FDA" yana da dacewa kai tsaye ga wannan tattaunawa ta yanzu game da rashin iyawar Dr. Peter Marks.
A ƙarshe, akwai batun gurɓataccen gurɓataccen DNA da lalata kusan dukkanin samfuran jiyya na Covid-genes na tushen “mRNA” na yanzu. Me yasa na sanya "mRNA" a cikin ƙididdiga? Saboda waɗannan samfuran ba za su yi amfani da mRNA da gaske ba - kamar yadda duk wanda ya kware sosai a cikin ilimin halittar ɗan adam zai gane da sauri - amma a yi amfani da analog na mRNA na roba da aka gyara sosai da ake magana da shi a matsayin "pseudo-mRNA." Wannan gyare-gyaren ne ke canza ƙwayoyin mRNA na ɗan gajeren lokaci zuwa kayan da za a iya amfani da su don samar da furotin amma ba ainihin mRNA ba - wanda Kwamitin Kyautar Nobel ya amince da Kariko da Weissman don ba da damar yin amfani da fasahar tushen fasahar rigakafin cutar ta Covid.
Kamar yadda Dokta Kevin McKernan da sauran masana kimiyyar kwayoyin halitta da yawa a duk faɗin duniya suka rubuta, tsarin masana'antu na yanzu da ake amfani da su don samar da waɗannan samfuran tushen jiyya na Covid suna haifar da kayan da suka gurɓace - lalata - tare da matakan gutsuttsura DNA (da jerin) waɗanda ba a yarda ko bayyanawa ga marasa lafiya da likitocin su. A ƙarƙashin yanayi na al'ada da kuma ƙarƙashin kulawar rashin son rai, wannan batun lalata ya kamata a gano shi tun kafin a ba da waɗannan samfuran ga mutane.
Bugu da ƙari, bayan gano McKernan da sauransu, yakamata FDA ta ƙaddamar da bincike nan da nan kuma ta janye waɗannan samfuran daga kasuwa saboda wannan zina. Madadin haka, Dokta Peter Marks, tare da haɗin kai tare da masana'antar rigakafi-masanin ilimin kimiyya da kuma memba na hukumar ba da shawara ta FDA Dokta Paul Offit ya ƙaddamar da wani kamfen ɗin watsa labarai na banza don ƙaryatãwa cewa tsarin bayarwa da aka yi amfani da shi don pseudo-mRNA zai kuma isar da gutsuttsuran DNA a cikin sel marasa lafiya.
Wannan matakin laifi ne, a ganina, kuma ya kamata a bincika kuma a tuhume shi gwargwadon goyon bayan dokar tarayya ta yanzu. Shugaba Biden mai barin gado bai yi wa Dr. Peter Marks afuwa ba.
Don ƙarin cikakkun bayanai, da fatan za a duba rubutun Substack masu zuwa:
Wannan tarihin Dr. Peter Marks da ayyukansa a lokacin rikicin Covid yana kwatanta sakamakon da zai haifar da kyale masana kimiyyar bureaucrat su tsara manufofin jama'a. Dokta Marks zai iya ba da gudummawa mai mahimmanci kuma mai amfani na dogon lokaci a FDA. Amma bai dace da matsayin Darakta na CBER ba. Ba shi da gogewa, horo, hankali, da yanayin aikin. A cikin aikinsa, ya ci nasara akai-akai, yana ba da misali mai kyau na abin ban mamaki mai suna "Peter Principle." A ƙarshen aikinsa na ma'aikacin gwamnati, ya ƙare daga FDA guda biyu ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun ƙwararrun alurar riga kafi, waɗanda dukansu biyun sun yi aiki da gaskiya tun lokacin da sanannen shawarar barin - musamman Dr. Philip Krause.
Haka ne, tarihin Dokta Peter Marks yana ba da kyakkyawan nazari na abin da ke faruwa lokacin da gwamnati ta daidaita don karɓuwa maimakon kyakkyawan matsayi a matsayin mai kula da kimiyya (bureaucrat). Amma bayan haka, wannan misali na musamman ya kuma nuna wata matsala da ta haifar da gazawa da gazawar dukkan masana'antar HHS don cika manufarta ta farko - don karewa da inganta lafiyar 'yan Amurka. Don sake fasalin da sake daidaita kasuwancin HHS da kayan aikin hukuma tare da aikin Sake Lafiyar Amurka Again zai buƙaci sake tsari mai ƙarfi da yanke ayyuka don kawar da ma'aikatan da ba su da yawa da kuma kawar da waɗanda aka haɓaka zuwa "matakin rashin iya aiki."
Wannan zai tarwatsa iyalai, haifar da rauni na mutum, kuma wasu daga cikin nagartattun ba za a “sake su ba.” Wannan shine yanayin sake fasalin ƙungiyoyi. Gabaɗaya jagora yayin wannan nau'in sake fasalin shine yakamata ku yanke zurfi fiye da yadda kuke buƙata, sannan ku fara ɗaukar hayar da sauri wanda ya dace da sabbin abubuwan fifiko da tsari.
Wannan shine yadda kuke gudanar da babban kasuwancin kasuwanci, kuma wannan shine abin da ake buƙatar yi a HHS. Don haka ka bar ni da hawaye da fushin ƙwararrun masana kimiyya-mahukunta irin su Dr. Marks da ire-irensa. Zai iya amfani da wannan a matsayin wata dama don sake nazarin ayyukansa, ko kuma ya zama wani Pharma shill ya ninka albashinsa. Duk wannan yana tunatar da ni game da abin ban sha'awa na Dokta Rick Bright - tsohon Daraktan BARDA, wanda ya yi tsalle zuwa kyakkyawan matsayi tare da Gidauniyar Rockefeller bayan ya bar HHS a cikin huff saboda an sake sanya shi don magance matsalar gwajin Covid mara kyau.
Amma ga sauran mu, ayyuka da rashin aikin Dr. Peter Marks ya yi mana illa. Kimiyyar tsarin mulki ta duniya, bincike na asibiti, da ka'idojin likitanci sun lalace ta ayyukansa. Kuma bacin ransa, hare-hare, da cin mutuncin Sakataren HHS tare da kukan da ya ke yi ya sa ni cikin halin ko in yafe wa wadannan laifuffukan cin zarafin bil'adama da kuma sana'ata.
Robert W. Malone likita ne kuma masanin ilimin halittu. Ayyukansa sun mayar da hankali kan fasahar mRNA, magunguna, da bincike na sake fasalin ƙwayoyi.
Tallafin kuɗin ku na Cibiyar Brownstone yana zuwa don tallafawa marubuta, lauyoyi, masana kimiyya, masana tattalin arziki, da sauran mutane masu jaruntaka waɗanda aka tsarkake su da sana'a da gudun hijira a lokacin tashin hankalin zamaninmu. Kuna iya taimakawa wajen fitar da gaskiya ta hanyar aikin da suke gudana.
Ta hanyar shaƙata ka'idojin USDA da barin jihohi su yi amfani da nasu sufeto don duba wuraren sarrafa nama "al'ada" (waɗanda a halin yanzu ba a yarda su sayar da nama ba amma kawai aiwatarwa…
Labarin da aka saba na babban ka'idojin kiyaye abinci na farko na al'umma ya nuna gurbatattun masana'antar da gwamnati ta tsaftace. Tarihin zurfafa yana ba da labari daban-daban na masana'antu a…
Duniya ce mai haɗari. Babu shakka cewa Cibiyar Brownstone ta kasance a cikin jerin abubuwan da aka yi niyya, watakila a saman jerin. Cewa an ƙirƙiri irin wannan tsari mai fa'ida kuma mai fa'ida…
Wannan ba zato ba ne ko makirci - shaida ce ta rantsuwa. Yanzu, kamar yadda Sakataren Kiwon Lafiya Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ya sake buɗe tambayoyin da aka daɗe ana watsi da su game da ma'aunin aluminium da kuma rashin dogon lokaci…
